1993
DOI: 10.1016/0960-9776(93)90129-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomised comparison of a 13 fraction schedule with a conventional 25 fraction schedule of radiotherapy after local excision of early breast cancer: preliminary analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies done up to present have too few patients to detect small differences in local recurrence rates at such high levels of tumour control. As pointed out by Yarnold et al (1994), large numbers of patients are needed for a meaningful comparison. Yarnold et al (1994) surveyed different institutions in the UK about their radiotherapy treatment schedules after BCS.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Fractionation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The studies done up to present have too few patients to detect small differences in local recurrence rates at such high levels of tumour control. As pointed out by Yarnold et al (1994), large numbers of patients are needed for a meaningful comparison. Yarnold et al (1994) surveyed different institutions in the UK about their radiotherapy treatment schedules after BCS.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Fractionation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out by Yarnold et al (1994), large numbers of patients are needed for a meaningful comparison. Yarnold et al (1994) surveyed different institutions in the UK about their radiotherapy treatment schedules after BCS. In table 3 under Yarnold et al (1995) we list the most utilized schedules according to the survey.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Fractionation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from randomized trials that compared hypofractionated radiation therapy with conventional radiation therapy, demonstrated no difference in late radiation morbidity or local recurrence [16][17][18][19][20][21]. A shorter fractionation schedule will lessen the burden of treatment for women, and will have important quality-of-life benefits with respect to convenience and less time away from home and work.…”
Section: Meta-analyses and Randomized Controlled Trials (At Least 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La implementación del esquema del hipofraccionamiento en cáncer de mama en el IOSE está apoyada por los datos de estos ensayos fase III, que compararon el tratamiento con RTE hipofraccionada versus RTE de esquema convencional, en mujeres con cáncer de mama. 2,7,8,14,17,19,20 El ensayo RMH/GOC 12 aleatorizó 1410 pacientes con cáncer de mama T1-3 N0-1 en tres ramas de tratamiento: 50Gy/25fx, 39Gy/13fx y 42,9Gy/13fx. Con base en un análisis de 158 eventos de recaída local del tumor ipsilateral, se demostró que la sensibilidad estimada de cáncer de mama por fracción de tamaño (valor α/β) es de 4,0 Gy, para cualquier cambio en la apariencia de mama, un valor bajo que permite el hipofraccionamiento sin perjudicar tejidos sanos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified