Randomised controlled trial of parent groups for child antisocial behaviour targeting multiple risk factors: the SPOKES project

Scott, Stephen; Sylva, Κathy; Doolan, Moira; Price, Jenny; Jacobs, Brian; Crook, Carolyn; Landau, Sabine

doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02127.x

Cited by 148 publications

(116 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

109

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The first is a high-risk clinic sample which included youths aged 9-17 years who were referred to mental health clinics in South London and Sussex aged 3-7 years because of antisocial behavior (Scott, Spender, Doolan, Jacobs, & Aspland, 2001); 107 of 141 original families were successfully followed-up in adolescence. The second is a moderate risk community sample, which was composed of youths aged 9-13 years who were originally studied as part of a treatment trial aged 4-6 years because of elevated conduct problems (Scott et al, 2010); 102 of 128 families in the original study were successfully followed-up in adolescence. A third sample is a foster sample recruited via Social Services' computerized records from the Children's Services Departments of two London boroughs (Joseph, O'Connor, Briskman, Maughan, & Scott, 2014) 1 .…”

Section: Methods Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensitivity to parenting in adolescents with callous/unemotional traits: Observational and experimental findings.

O’Connor

Humayun

Briskman

et al. 2016

Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

King's College LondonChildren and adolescents with callous-unemotional (CU) traits have been distinguished as a subset of individuals with disruptive behavioral disorders who may be less sensitive to parenting influence; we test this hypothesis using multiple methods and assessment paradigms. Two hundred seventy-one adolescents (mean age ϭ 12.6 years) from 3 samples at elevated risk for disruptive behavior disorders were studied. Symptoms of CU behavior were derived from standard questionnaire; assessments of behavioral adjustment were derived from clinical interview with parent, and parent-report, teacher-report, and self-report questionnaire. Parent-child relationship quality was based on observational assessments in which adolescent and parent behaviors were rated in 3 interaction tasks: (a) low conflict planning task; (b) problem-solving conflict task; (c) puzzle challenge task; parent interview and parent-report and child-report questionnaires of parenting were also assessed. Results indicated that the associations between parent-child relationship quality and behavioral adjustment were comparable in adolescents with and without CU traits. More notably, observational data indicated that adolescents with elevated CU traits showed comparatively greater within-individual variability in observed angry/irritable behavior across interaction tasks, suggesting greater sensitivity to and emotional dysregulation in challenging interpersonal contexts. The findings suggest that adolescents with CU are not less sensitive to parental influence and may in contrast show greater context-sensitive disturbances in emotional regulation. The results have implications for family-based assessment and treatment for adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders.

show abstract

Section: Methods Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensitivity to parenting in adolescents with callous/unemotional traits: Observational and experimental findings.

O’Connor

Humayun

Briskman

et al. 2016

Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…LON-SPO: a community-based trial in England, investigating IY and a literacy intervention in low-income primary schools, with children with conduct problems (1-6 years). 100 11. LON-PAL: a community-based trial in England, investigating IY and a literacy intervention, in low-income primary schools, with children from disadvantaged families.…”

Section: Appendix 2 Further Details Of the Trialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Could scale-up of parenting programmes improve child disruptive behaviour and reduce social inequalities? Using individual participant data meta-analysis to establish for whom programmes are effective and cost-effective

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: journals.library@nihr.ac.ukThe full PHR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/phr. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Public Health Research journalReports are published in Public Health Research (PHR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the PHR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Public Health Research are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search, appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. PHR programmeThe Public Health Research (PHR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), evaluates public health interventions, providing new knowledge on the benefits, costs, acceptability and wider impacts of non-NHS interventions intended to improve the health of the public and reduce inequalities in health. The scope of the programme is multi-disciplinary and broad, covering a range of interventions that improve public health. The Public Health Research programme also complements the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme which has a growing portfolio evaluating NHS public health interventions.For more information about the PHR programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/phr This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the PHR programme as project number 12/3070/04. The contractual start date was in November 2013. The final report began editorial review in February 2016 and was accepted for publication in September 2016. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PHR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the PHR programme or the Department of Health. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the PHR programme or the Department of Health. © Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO 2017. This work was produced by Gardner et al. under the terms of a comm...

show abstract

“…The seven studies were observational studies of mother-child or father-child interaction that involved molecular coding of specific parental behaviors (i.e., the frequency of specific parent behaviors were coded during live or videotaped interactions of parents and their children) and factor analyses of the observational data were reported. Four of these articles were evaluations of large-scale, behaviorally based, parenting interventions, [25][26][27][28] and three were smallerscale, correlational studies of parent-child interaction. [29][30][31] The sample sizes ranged from 80 to over 800 (two factor analytic studies employing smaller samples are not reviewed here).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parenting Dimensions and Styles: A Brief History and Recommendations for Future Research

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last decade, researchers have uncovered relationships between general parenting styles and children's obesity. This is an emerging area of research, and there currently is a great deal of interest in the parent's role. This review was written to provide researchers entering this area with a historical introduction to parenting research and to point to some directions for future inquiry. Over the last 75 years, considerable insight has been gained into individual differences in parenting behavior, especially regarding the dimensions underlying individual differences in general parenting approach, and parenting styles resulting from individual differences on these dimensions. The history of empirical attempts to identify parenting dimensions and styles is reviewed briefly, followed by a review of more recent studies of parenting styles. Next is a discussion of data analytic approaches to measuring parenting, with a particular emphasis on variable-centered versus person-centered approaches. Because investigators have often disagreed about which of these approaches is the most appropriate, the advantages and disadvantages of each are considered, along with recommendations for future research.

show abstract

Randomised controlled trial of parent groups for child antisocial behaviour targeting multiple risk factors: the SPOKES project

Abstract: Effective population-based early intervention to improve the functioning of with antisocial behaviour is practically feasible by targeting multiple risk factors and emphasising implementation fidelity.

Cited by 148 publications

References 34 publications

Sensitivity to parenting in adolescents with callous/unemotional traits: Observational and experimental findings.

Sensitivity to parenting in adolescents with callous/unemotional traits: Observational and experimental findings.

Could scale-up of parenting programmes improve child disruptive behaviour and reduce social inequalities? Using individual participant data meta-analysis to establish for whom programmes are effective and cost-effective

Parenting Dimensions and Styles: A Brief History and Recommendations for Future Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About