1996
DOI: 10.1039/ft9969204357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomization and isomerization rate constants for isocyanogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,4 The potential energy distribution at an energy about 2 eV above threshold is shown in Fig. 2 for each reactant.…”
Section: Molecular Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,4 The potential energy distribution at an energy about 2 eV above threshold is shown in Fig. 2 for each reactant.…”
Section: Molecular Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For small molecules like NCNC, 4 and a little bit larger, 13 it is possible to achieve polynomial fits to very highlevel ab initio energies. Restricting ourselves to isomerization reactions and to energies sufficiently ''high'' for the system to be at the correspondence limit, we can assume that the topology of such a potential energy surface will include the couplings between all of the motions in a proper manner.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, as a result of the high endoergicity of reaction 1, the problem of zero-point energy (ZPE) conservation in the CH 3 product should be the most relevant disadvantage of using classical trajectories, even in the combustion range of temperatures. However, many strategies have been proposed [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] to approximately correct for this problem. Among these, some are designated as active, because they seek to correct the ZPE leakage along the integration of each trajectory, while the others take into account only the energies of reactant and product molecules (and sometimes that of the transition-state structure) and, hence, are called passive methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential energy surfaces used were: for CH 3 NC = CH 3 CN, the empirical surface constructed by Sumpter and Thompson; 7 and for NCNC = NCCN, an 870-point ''clampednuclei'' MP2/6-31G* ab initio potential surface. 6,8 Fig . 1 shows the key properties of the two potential energy surfaces.…”
Section: Computational Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%