2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomization of CATA attributes: Should attribute lists be allocated to assessors or to samples?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
58
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Attributes used for TCATA profiling of rums were the same as those used for DA profiling of commercial rum products. Positions of attributes used in TCATA profiling were randomized across panelists, but were constant for each panelist throughout the course of data collection (Meyners & Castura, ). Panelists were allowed unlimited selection and deselection of all attributes over the course of evaluation, with no attribute fading included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attributes used for TCATA profiling of rums were the same as those used for DA profiling of commercial rum products. Positions of attributes used in TCATA profiling were randomized across panelists, but were constant for each panelist throughout the course of data collection (Meyners & Castura, ). Panelists were allowed unlimited selection and deselection of all attributes over the course of evaluation, with no attribute fading included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of attributes was randomized using the "to assessor" list order allocation scheme (Meyners & Castura, 2016). Subjects were asked to check from the list all the terms that they considered appropriate to describe each of the samples.…”
Section: Check-all-that-apply (Cata) Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were asked to check from the list all the terms that they considered appropriate to describe each of the samples. The position of attributes was randomized using the "to assessor" list order allocation scheme (Meyners & Castura, 2016).…”
Section: Check-all-that-apply (Cata) Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the test, consumers were instructed to familiarise themselves with the position of the attributes on screen, which were presented in a three-column format. The attribute order was randomised across subjects to balance bias associated with list order but was retained for a given panellist (Meyners & Castura, 2016).…”
Section: That-apply (Tcata)mentioning
confidence: 99%