1958
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomization Tests for a Multivariate Two-Sample Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis was repeated 10,000 times, and the proportions of the random replications that resulted in as many significant proteins as seen in the actual data were reported as the significance levels for the number of proteins. 13,14 Significance of class prediction dependent on unsupervised analysis was based on a Fisher's exact test or 2 test, as appropriate. Relatedness in cytokine expression patterns before and after IL-2 administration was displayed by Eisen's hierarchical clustering applied to proteomics as previously described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis was repeated 10,000 times, and the proportions of the random replications that resulted in as many significant proteins as seen in the actual data were reported as the significance levels for the number of proteins. 13,14 Significance of class prediction dependent on unsupervised analysis was based on a Fisher's exact test or 2 test, as appropriate. Relatedness in cytokine expression patterns before and after IL-2 administration was displayed by Eisen's hierarchical clustering applied to proteomics as previously described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariate two-sample tests have been of continuous interest to the statistics community. Chung and Fraser (1958) proposed several randomization tests. Bickel (1969) constructed a multivariate two-sample test by conditioning on the empirical distribution function of the pooled sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have suggested methods of direct combination applied to the T k j statistics themselves [5,6]. They are more appealing computationally, being O(nM N ) instead of our method's O(nM N log(N )), but they do not avoid problems of differing scale or strong correlation.…”
Section: Relation To Other Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike methods of direct combination, which sum up various test statistics [5,6], our method is invariant to the scale of each term. This is critical when different shape parameters have different physical units and the choice of weighting between them can be arbitrary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%