2017
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized clinical trial comparing collagen plug and advancement flap for trans-sphincteric anal fistula

Abstract: There was a considerably higher recurrence rate after the anal fistula plug procedure than following advancement flap repair. Registration number: NCT01021774 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparator group, treated with a fistula plug, achieved clinical success in only a third of patients. MRI confirmation of healing was not reported in either arm . This study represents a robustly performed assessment of transanal rectal advancement flap surgery in well‐selected patients, and is a realistic report of the technique.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparator group, treated with a fistula plug, achieved clinical success in only a third of patients. MRI confirmation of healing was not reported in either arm . This study represents a robustly performed assessment of transanal rectal advancement flap surgery in well‐selected patients, and is a realistic report of the technique.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A subsequent meta-analysis comparing the plug with ERAF failed to show any difference in recurrence rates or complications [181]. However, a recent robust multicentre RCT of 94 patients with a transsphincteric fistula demonstrated clinical healing at 12 months in only 38% (15 of 44 patients) treated by collagen plug, compared with 66% (27 of 41 patients) treated by ERAF [148].…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the study was based on the results after pooling of both retrospective studies and RCTs, and this can lead to bias. Recently, Bondi et al undertook a randomized prospective double-blinded multicentre trial, which produced a high level of evidence, for the comparison of AFP and RAF [3]. Their study reached a similar conclusion to Ortiz et al in that there was a higher recurrence rate after the use of the AFP than the RAF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) original research from non-RCTs or RCTs among adults; (2) the interventions of interest were AFP and RAF; (3) the [3] 2017 Norway Sweden RCT Fistula involving more than a third of the external anal sphincter AFP RAF Schwandner [17] 2013 Germany RCT(conference abstract)…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rectal flap advancement is one of the sphincter‐sparing techniques. The superiority of rectal flap advancement compared to an anal plug has been shown in two randomized controlled trials . Advancement flaps were first described by Noble in 1902 and modified in 1912 and 1948 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%