2006
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized clinical trial of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for non-reconstructive breast surgery

Abstract: The administration of a single dose of flucloxacillin failed to reduce the rate of wound infection after non-reconstructive breast surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we selected dicloxacillin, to which gram-positive cocci generally are sensitive. Previous studies have used azithromycin, clarithromycin, augmentin, cephalosporins, or flucloxacillin as prophylactic antimicrobial agents [2,4]. Although recent Cochrane studies and meta-analyses indicated that prophylactic antibiotics reduce the risk of SSI in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer [1,2], our singlecenter study could not find any clear benefit for a prophylactic antibiotic associated with preoperative core biopsy.…”
Section: Core Biopsy and Ssi 319mentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we selected dicloxacillin, to which gram-positive cocci generally are sensitive. Previous studies have used azithromycin, clarithromycin, augmentin, cephalosporins, or flucloxacillin as prophylactic antimicrobial agents [2,4]. Although recent Cochrane studies and meta-analyses indicated that prophylactic antibiotics reduce the risk of SSI in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer [1,2], our singlecenter study could not find any clear benefit for a prophylactic antibiotic associated with preoperative core biopsy.…”
Section: Core Biopsy and Ssi 319mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This is reasonable because many earlier studies showed a 30-70% decrease of SSI after prophylactic antibiotics in breast cancer surgery [1,2,10]. For example, the recent negative randomized study used an expected decrease in the rate of incisional sepsis from 20% to 10% (50% decrease) [4]. If the study power goal had been a 30% difference or less to avoid a type two error, about 1,200 patients would have been needed in each group.…”
Section: Core Biopsy and Ssi 319mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,28 Further, many studies have addressed the role of antibiotics use in reduction mammaplasty. [15][16][17]19,21,29 The search for an ideal postsurgical breast dressing has led to the development of a number of different materials and application techniques. 30,31 The evidence supporting dressing standards for incisional wounds, including breast surgery wounds, is empiric and scarce, however.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since there is a finite risk (1-4%) of surgical-site infection after breast-conserving surgery, to what degree does the higher incidence of infection after the open-cavity technique reflect the combined result of postlumpectomy infection and catheter-related infection. 3,4 Interestingly, the MammoSite Registry reported a higher overall incidence of acute skin toxicity compared to breast infection (12 versus 9%) and a lower incidence of acute skin toxicity with antibiotic usage (P \ 0.0001). 3 This suggests that postprocedural oral antibiotics should be routinely given to patients undergoing catheter-based APBI regardless of the timing of catheter placement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%