2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized clinical trial of vessel sealing system (LigaSure) in esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy in patients with portal hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of our observation, there is a report in the medical literature describing the intraoperative consequences of a failed LigaSure vascular seal . However, the overwhelming burden of evidence suggests that use of the LigaSure handsets reduces intraoperative hemorrhage compared with traditional techniques . Ultimately, it is the responsibility of each surgeon choosing to employ a reused handset to balance the increasing risk of vascular seal failure with multiple reuse cycles against the reduced cost of a beneficial technology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In support of our observation, there is a report in the medical literature describing the intraoperative consequences of a failed LigaSure vascular seal . However, the overwhelming burden of evidence suggests that use of the LigaSure handsets reduces intraoperative hemorrhage compared with traditional techniques . Ultimately, it is the responsibility of each surgeon choosing to employ a reused handset to balance the increasing risk of vascular seal failure with multiple reuse cycles against the reduced cost of a beneficial technology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…27 However, the overwhelming burden of evidence suggests that use of the LigaSure handsets reduces intraoperative hemorrhage compared with traditional techniques. [28][29][30] Ultimately, it is the responsibility of each surgeon choosing to employ a reused handset to balance the increasing risk of vascular seal failure with multiple reuse cycles against the reduced cost of a beneficial technology. Investigation of the safety profile of LigaSure handsets intended for minimally invasive surgery undergoing reuse/resterilization is warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LVSS was designed as an alternative to clips or ligatures for sealing vessels ≤ 7 mm in diameter. Comparative studies have proven that LVSS is as safe, feasible, and beneficial as other vessel closure tools and techniques, including the plasma trisector, the surgical clip, the harmonic scalpel, and conventional hemostasis 14‐16. An increasing number of recent reports have described the use of LVSS not only for the sealing of vessels but also for the dissection/transection of various soft and parenchymal tissues (eg, liver resection, pancreatectomy, pulmonary resection, and hysterectomy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For its prominent advantages of safe and reliable hemostatic properties and low thermal conductivity, it is widely used on patients with cirrhosis. Yao et al [26] demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of its application in devascularization on patients with portal hypertension in their randomized clinical trials, but some scholars [27] hold conservative and cautious attitudes, we also had no experience of processing the splenic pedicle with LigaSure in this study. More large-scale clinical researches are needed to study its safety in the processing of splenic vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%