2012
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized clinical trial on the effect of fibrin sealant on latissimus dorsi donor-site seroma formation after breast reconstruction

Abstract: This randomized study, which was powered for size effect, failed to show any benefit from fibrin sealant in minimizing back seromas after LD procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the latissimus dorsi harvest site during breast reconstruction following mastectomy, two papers support its use [181, 182] in conjunction with quilting sutures and two papers suggest that it does not work when used alone [183, 184]. In a single center nonrandomized sequential trial of using fibrin sealant alone ( n = 25) versus quilting sutures with sprayed fibrin sealant ( n = 21) conducted over a period of 5 months, significant reductions in the incidence of seroma (76% versus 42.9%, P = 0.022), seroma volume (median 30, range 20.0–46.7 versus median 45.0, range 25.0–160.0 mL, P = 0.043), total drainage (median 754.8, range 623.7–925.2 versus median 1,228.6, range 824.2–2,078.0 mL, P = 0.002), indwelling period of drainage (12.1 ± 3.9 versus 15.8 ± 5.9 mL, P = 0.01), and frequency of aspiration (4.8% versus 12%, P = 0.043) was found in favor of using quilting sutures and fibrin sealant [181].…”
Section: Most Frequent Fibrin Sealant Clinical Literature Applicatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the latissimus dorsi harvest site during breast reconstruction following mastectomy, two papers support its use [181, 182] in conjunction with quilting sutures and two papers suggest that it does not work when used alone [183, 184]. In a single center nonrandomized sequential trial of using fibrin sealant alone ( n = 25) versus quilting sutures with sprayed fibrin sealant ( n = 21) conducted over a period of 5 months, significant reductions in the incidence of seroma (76% versus 42.9%, P = 0.022), seroma volume (median 30, range 20.0–46.7 versus median 45.0, range 25.0–160.0 mL, P = 0.043), total drainage (median 754.8, range 623.7–925.2 versus median 1,228.6, range 824.2–2,078.0 mL, P = 0.002), indwelling period of drainage (12.1 ± 3.9 versus 15.8 ± 5.9 mL, P = 0.01), and frequency of aspiration (4.8% versus 12%, P = 0.043) was found in favor of using quilting sutures and fibrin sealant [181].…”
Section: Most Frequent Fibrin Sealant Clinical Literature Applicatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jandali et al (8) apply muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps for the treatment of axillary hidradenitis in order to reduce the donor site morbidity. LlewellynBennett et al (12) make use of fibrin sealant to avoid seroma formation at the donor site. Better aesthetic result at this area can be achieved by endoscopically assisted LDF harvesting (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FSs are being explored for anal fistula closure, adhesion prevention, seroma reduction, as well as urologic, vascular, intestinal and nerve anastomoses [20,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. The adhesive properties are being exploited as an alternative fixation technique in various hernia repairs, as a means of pain reduction from reduced suture or tack placement, or for pain reduction after plastic surgical procedures [44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%