2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01408-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized clinical trials in ANCA-associated vasculitis: a systematic analysis of the WHO - International Clinical Trials Registry Platform

Abstract: Background: The analysis of the main features of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) can inform future study design. Methods: We searched within the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform all registered RCTs on AAV from October 2008 to December 2018. Two reviewers selected studies according to pre-specified eligibility criteria. We retrieved information including countries, funding, design, sample sizes, eligibility criteria, primary outcomes (POs), and treatments. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in key AAV outcomes may not be apparent in clinical trials owing to their own limitations, including the fact that more than 1 disease had often been included to overcome their rarity, and, hence, they were not powered to detect significant differences about a given intervention’s efficacy within a single disease entity. 20 Our clinical data from a larger subset of patient with GPA indicated a specific advantage of rituximab over cyclophosphamide induction therapy for patients classified as having GPA, most of whom had PR3-ANCA–positive disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in key AAV outcomes may not be apparent in clinical trials owing to their own limitations, including the fact that more than 1 disease had often been included to overcome their rarity, and, hence, they were not powered to detect significant differences about a given intervention’s efficacy within a single disease entity. 20 Our clinical data from a larger subset of patient with GPA indicated a specific advantage of rituximab over cyclophosphamide induction therapy for patients classified as having GPA, most of whom had PR3-ANCA–positive disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Furthermore, a post hoc analysis of trial data from 131 patients with PR3-AAV (127 of whom were classified as having GPA) showed that patients with PR3-AAV were more than twice as likely to achieve complete remission at 6 months when treated with rituximab rather than with cyclophosphamide (65% vs 48%, respectively; P = .04). Differences in key AAV outcomes may not be apparent in clinical trials owing to their own limitations, including the fact that more than 1 disease had often been included to overcome their rarity, and, hence, they were not powered to detect significant differences about a given intervention’s efficacy within a single disease entity . Our clinical data from a larger subset of patient with GPA indicated a specific advantage of rituximab over cyclophosphamide induction therapy for patients classified as having GPA, most of whom had PR3-ANCA–positive disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%