2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02514-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized comparison of success and adverse event rates and cost effectiveness of one long versus two short stents for treatment of long coronary narrowings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, the authors did report that the use of one long, solitary stent was associated with a reduction in catheterization time, dye volume usage, and duration of radiation exposure. Similar findings were reported in a prospective, randomized trial (10) with further mention that placement of one long stent for extensive lesions is also more cost effective. In a separate investigation from Spain (17), patients with a long coronary lesion (>20 mm) treated with a single long stent had no significant difference in 2-year outcomes compared to management with multiple stents (overlapping and non-overlapping).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Of note, the authors did report that the use of one long, solitary stent was associated with a reduction in catheterization time, dye volume usage, and duration of radiation exposure. Similar findings were reported in a prospective, randomized trial (10) with further mention that placement of one long stent for extensive lesions is also more cost effective. In a separate investigation from Spain (17), patients with a long coronary lesion (>20 mm) treated with a single long stent had no significant difference in 2-year outcomes compared to management with multiple stents (overlapping and non-overlapping).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In-stent binary restenosis was reduced in the TAXUS group to 9.1% from 32.9% in the control patients (Pϭ0.0001; relative reduction, 72%). Published trials assessing the angiographic response to bare-metal stents implanted in long lesions predict a binary restenosis rate of 39% to 45%, 11,12 comparable with bare-metal stents used in the control limb of the other published drug-eluting stent trials of simple lesions, for example, 36.7% in the RAVEL trial, 5 35.4% in the SIRIUS trial, 6 and 42.3% in the E-SIRIUS trial. 7 Despite the already favorable angiographic result with the control (Express 2 ) stent, there was an additional 53% reduction in TVR (the primary end point of the study) from 19.4% to 9.1% in the TAXUS group compared with control (Pϭ0.0027).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Recently, technological innovation allowed dedicated longer stents to be manufactured to avoid the limitations of multiple stents deployment. Advantages associated with the use of one very‐long stent compared with a multiple stents strategy include the reduction of procedure duration, contrast volume, radiation exposure both for the patient and the operator and cost of the procedure .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%