2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized controlled antiepileptic drug trials miss almost all patients with ongoing seizures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while necessary for regulatory approval, the controlled environment and criteria for these types of trials do not account for variabilities that are part of everyday real-world clinical practice. For example, these studies tend to exclude PWE who may be most at risk for BAEs (e.g., patients with a history of comorbid psychiatric conditions), are limited in time and patient exposure to the drug, and often do not allow the use of at least some concomitant medications and supplements, which may influence the incidence and/or severity of BAEs [16,19,20]. Therefore, it is unlikely that these data represent the experience with medications in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while necessary for regulatory approval, the controlled environment and criteria for these types of trials do not account for variabilities that are part of everyday real-world clinical practice. For example, these studies tend to exclude PWE who may be most at risk for BAEs (e.g., patients with a history of comorbid psychiatric conditions), are limited in time and patient exposure to the drug, and often do not allow the use of at least some concomitant medications and supplements, which may influence the incidence and/or severity of BAEs [16,19,20]. Therefore, it is unlikely that these data represent the experience with medications in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kork Epilepsy Center is one the largest traditional epilepsy centers in Germany offering 122 in-patient beds and more than 6.000 out-patient appointments per year. As a consequence, many of our patients suffer from difficult-to-treat epilepsy syndromes with ongoing seizures in spite of numerous previous therapeutic strategies [3,4]. As soon as a new antiepileptic drug (AED) is marketed many of those patients who have been urgently waiting or a new treatment option will be treated with such a new AED within a relatively short period of time [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results from regulatory clinical trials are difficult to extrapolate into clinical practice, as these studies are limited by their short duration, and rigid inclusion and exclusion criteria excluding most epilepsy patients, and lack of dosing flexibility . Upon introduction of new AEDs, there is limited information about the potential efficacy and tolerability in a naturalistic clinical setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 However, results from regulatory clinical trials are difficult to extrapolate into clinical practice, as these studies are limited by their short duration, and rigid inclusion and exclusion criteria excluding most epilepsy patients, and lack of dosing flexibility. 16,17 Upon introduction of new AEDs, there is limited information about the potential efficacy and tolerability in a naturalistic clinical setting. Therefore, it remains pivotal to assess new AEDs, such as BRV, in terms of their efficacy, tolerability and retention, a robust factor combining both, as well as quality of life and long-term safety, in a real-life setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%