2010
DOI: 10.4088/jcp.08m04979ora
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Controlled Trial of Interventions for Young People at Ultra High Risk for Psychosis

Abstract: http://www.anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN012605000247673.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
2
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
119
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it has been postulated that at times psychotic-like symptoms may represent 'clinical noise' around a non-psychotic syndrome [55]. Regardless of this the high levels of distress and impairments our participants reported suggest that these individuals require some form of support from services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Indeed, it has been postulated that at times psychotic-like symptoms may represent 'clinical noise' around a non-psychotic syndrome [55]. Regardless of this the high levels of distress and impairments our participants reported suggest that these individuals require some form of support from services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Seven studies -three intervention (Berger et al, 2012;McGorry et al, 2002;Yung et al, 2011) and four cohort (Phillips et al, 2009;Thompson et al, 2007;Yung et al, 1996;Yung et al, 2003) studies -were conducted over this period.…”
Section: Setting and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murphy & Brewer (2011a) fail to distinguish between individuals in the prodrome and individuals at ultra-high risk of psychosis: this is a key conceptual problem for the field. They also fail to report that the rate of conversion to psychosis in recent studies of high-risk populations is very low and that work from EPPIC itself (Yung 2011) showed 6-month conversion rates of between 5.1% and 7.0%. The EPPIC study also failed to show any difference in primary or secondary out comes between cognitive therapy plus risperidone, cognitive therapy plus placebo, supportive therapy and simply monitoring.…”
Section: Propping Up the Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 91%