2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized controlled trial of mailed Nicotine Replacement Therapy to Canadian smokers: study protocol

Abstract: BackgroundConsiderable public health efforts are ongoing Canada-wide to reduce the prevalence of smoking in the general population. From 1985 to 2005, smoking rates among adults decreased from 35% to 19%, however, since that time, the prevalence has plateaued at around 18-19%. To continue to reduce the number of smokers at the population level, one option has been to translate interventions that have demonstrated clinical efficacy into population level initiatives. Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) has a cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abstinence was not biochemically verified in the current study. A future trial designed to assess effectiveness of this intervention could verify abstinence by collecting saliva samples through the mail to determine salivary cotinine levels [ 43 ]. Finally, without knowing the number of smokers to whom information about the study was disseminated, the fact that we were able to recruit 500 eligible smokers within 6 months is not an entirely informative indicator of the success of our recruitment efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abstinence was not biochemically verified in the current study. A future trial designed to assess effectiveness of this intervention could verify abstinence by collecting saliva samples through the mail to determine salivary cotinine levels [ 43 ]. Finally, without knowing the number of smokers to whom information about the study was disseminated, the fact that we were able to recruit 500 eligible smokers within 6 months is not an entirely informative indicator of the success of our recruitment efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed research protocol has been published elsewhere 37. Briefly, this RCT employed a single-blinded, survey design with random assignment to an experimental and a control condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of a large randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the efficacy of mailed distribution of NRT to Canadian smokers,37 the objective of the current study was to examine the influence of lifetime history of depression and/or anxiety on smoking cessation success following the free distribution of nicotine patches. The randomised trial recruited participants who were interested in receiving free nicotine patches and compared quit rates between participants who were sent a 5-week course of nicotine patches (without behavioural assistance) and those who were not offered the patches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research was approved by the institutional review board at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. The published protocol 14 was approved by the institutional review board at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health before trial initiation.…”
Section: Trial Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details of the sample size calculations and statistical analyses can be found in the trial protocol in the Supplement. 14 In brief, based on data from the 2008 Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey, 15 we estimated that a baseline smoking cessation rate of 3.7% would be observed in the control group at 6 months. This estimate was consistent with another report 16 of successful unassisted long-term abstinence rates of 3% to 5%.…”
Section: Outcomes and Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%