VISITAG Module) uses an algorithm for the automated annotation of RF ablation applications based on objective, predefined parameters. Because it provides crucial information on catheter stability and ablation intensity at each site, it may be helpful in accomplishing durable PVI.The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the utility of automated ablation lesion annotation by comparing procedure parameters and outcomes between automated annotation-guided and non-guided procedures.
Methods
SubjectsThe study was conducted under a retrospective, singlecenter observational design. We included 91 AF patients who underwent initial PVI by an experienced operator between June 2013 and January 2015. We performed 51 initial AF ablations from June 2014 to January 2015. We C atheter ablation (CA) is an effective therapy of atrial fibrillation (AF). The cornerstone of CA for AF is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). 1,2 Despite initially successful PVI, however, recurrence of AF after CA occurs frequently and is often related to the recovery of conduction between the pulmonary vein (PV) and left atrium (LA). 3-5 Contact force (CF) monitoring of the ablation catheter might help achieve more durable lesions and substantially improve procedural outcomes. 6 A recent randomized, multicenter study, however, showed that CF data availability was associated with reduced acute PV reconnections but not improved 1-year success rates, procedure and fluoroscopy times, or complication rates. 7 The failure of CF monitoring to improve clinical outcome of AF ablation might be due to a lack of information on the catheter stability as well as the precise location of ablated lesions, and subsequent heterogeneous ablation intensity. Background: Durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is critical in reducing recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). The VISITAG Module, an automatic annotation system that takes account of catheter stability and contact force (CF), might be useful in accomplishing this.