Randomized controlled trial of the effects of high intensity and low-to-moderate intensity exercise on physical fitness and fatigue in cancer survivors: results of the Resistance and Endurance exercise After ChemoTherapy (REACT) study

Abstract

BackgroundInternational evidence-based guidelines recommend physical exercise to form part of standard care for all cancer survivors. However, at present, the optimum exercise intensity is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a high intensity (HI) and low-to-moderate intensity (LMI) resistance and endurance exercise program compared with a wait list control (WLC) group on physical fitness and fatigue in a mixed group of cancer survivors who completed primary cancer treatment, including chemotherapy.MethodsOverall, 277 cancer survivors were randomized to 12 weeks of HI exercise (n = 91), LMI exercise (n = 95), or WLC (n = 91). Both interventions were identical with respect to exercise type, duration and frequency, and only differed in intensity. Measurements were performed at baseline (4–6 weeks after primary treatment) and post-intervention. The primary outcomes were cardiorespiratory fitness (peakVO2), muscle strength (grip strength and 30-second chair-stand test), and self-reported fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory; MFI). Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, physical activity, daily functioning, body composition, mood, and sleep disturbances. Multilevel linear regression analyses were performed to estimate intervention effects using an intention-to-treat principle.ResultsIn the HI and LMI groups, 74 % and 70 % of the participants attended more than 80 % of the prescribed exercise sessions, respectively (P = 0.53). HI (β = 2.2; 95 % CI, 1.2–3.1) and LMI (β = 1.3; 95 % CI, 0.3–2.3) exercise showed significantly larger improvements in peakVO2 compared to WLC. Improvements in peakVO2 were larger for HI than LMI exercise (β = 0.9; 95 % CI, −0.1 to 1.9), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.08). No intervention effects were found for grip strength and the 30-second chair-stand test. HI and LMI exercise significantly reduced general and physical fatigue and reduced activity (MFI subscales) compared to WLC, with no significant differences between both interventions. Finally, compared to WLC, we found benefits in global quality of life and anxiety after HI exercise, improved physical functioning after HI and LMI exercise, and less problems at work after LMI exercise.ConclusionsShortly after completion of cancer treatment, both HI and LMI exercise were safe and effective. There may be a dose–response relationship between exercise intensity and peakVO2, favoring HI exercise. HI and LMI exercise were equally effective in reducing general and physical fatigue.Trial registrationThis study was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register [NTR2153] on the 5th of January 2010.

Depression in cancer: The many biobehavioral pathways driving tumor progression

“…In keeping with this view, in another RCT on patients with lung cancer, an adjunctive 12-week exercise intervention, consisting in moderate-intensity walking for 40 min per day, 3 days per week, was feasible and effective in reducing depressive symptoms and anxiety as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) 185 . Another RCT, examining the differential impact between a high-intensity and a low-moderate regimen of physical exercise in subjects with cancer, demonstrated that both regimens are effective in reducing measures of fatigue and physical functioning as compared to wait-list controls 186 . Moreover, physical exercise programs improved measures of work functioning.…”

Validation and Refinement of Prediction Models to Estimate Exercise Capacity in Cancer Survivors Using the Steep Ramp Test

“…This study used data collected in 2 randomized controlled exercise trialsdEXercise Intervention after Stem cell Transplantation study 15 and Resistance and Endurance exercise After Chemotherapy study 16,17 din cancer survivors, which were part of the Alpe d'HuZes Cancer Rehabilitation program. 18 The EXercise Intervention after Stem cell Transplantation study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which 109 patients, who were recently treated with autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma or (non-)Hodgkin lymphoma, were recruited from 9 hospitals.…”

“…15 The Resistance and Endurance exercise After Chemotherapy study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which 277 patients diagnosed with breast, colon, ovarian, cervix, or testis cancer or lymphoma, who had recently completed primary cancer treatment (including chemotherapy), were recruited from 9 hospitals. 16,17 Approval for these studies was obtained from medical ethics committees of all participating centers, and all participants provided written informed consent.…”

“…We used data that were gathered in the context of randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of exercise interventions in cancer survivors. 15,17 The timing of the tests relative to each other was not fixed, but depended on trial logistics. We tried to limit the potential effect of time between measurements by selecting only those cancer survivors who were tested on the CPET and SRT within a maximum range of 30 days.…”

Muscle mass as a target to reduce fatigue in patients with advanced cancer

“…Which type of exercise (e.g. aerobic, resistance), and at which intensity level, contributes most to the positive effect on CRF is not yet fully known4, 12, 13 and neither is the pathophysiological mechanism of this effect. Several studies have been performed investigating the effect of exercise interventions on CRF in patients with limited disease, and their results indicate improvement of CRF and increased muscle mass, but the effect sizes varied 14, 15, 16, 17, 18.…”