Randomized controlled trial to investigate impact of site‐based safer sex programmes in Kingston, Jamaica: trial design, methods and baseline findings

Abstract

Summaryobjective To describe the design, methods and baseline findings of a multi-level prevention intervention to increase consistent condom use among persons at public social sites in Kingston, Jamaica, who have new or concurrent sexual partnerships.methods A two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 147 sites where persons meet new sex partners. Sites were identified by community informants as places where people meet new sexual partners, which include bars, street locations, bus stops, malls and others. Sites were sorted into 50 clusters based on geographic proximity and type of site and randomized to receive a multi-level sitebased intervention or not. Intervention components include on-site HIV testing, condom promotion and peer education. Effectiveness of the intervention will be measured by comparing the proportion of persons with new or multiple partners in the past year who report recent inconsistent condom use at intervention vs. control sites.results Baseline surveys were conducted at 66 intervention (711 men, 845 women) and 65 control sites (654 men, 738 women). Characteristics of intervention and control sites as well as the characteristics of patrons at these sites were similar. The outcome variable was balanced with approximately 30% of men and 25% of women at intervention and control sites reporting a new partner or more than one partner in the past year and recent inconsistent condom use.conclusions The baseline findings confirm that the population is an appropriate target group for HIV prevention and that randomization will provide the means to estimate programme effectiveness.keywords sexual behaviour, human immunodeficiency virus, randomized controlled trial, Jamaica, prevention

Measurement of HIV Prevention Indicators: A Comparison of the PLACE Method and a Household Survey in Zambia

“…The PLACE populations in Zambia also tended to be younger and more likely to be never married. Other studies have also found the PLACE population to have more risky behaviors than the general population (Weir et al 2004; Weir et al 2008; Spiezer et al 2007). However this study is unique in being able to make district level comparisons during a specified time interval.…”

“…In Jamaica PLACE respondents interviewed in Montego Bay and Kingston in 2002 and 2003 were compared to respondents from the national Knowledge Attitudes Practice and Behavior Study in 2004. PLACE respondents were found to be more likely to have 2 or more partners in the past year and one or more new partner in the past year (Weir et al 2008). In a comparison of methods in Haiti, PLACE respondents interviewed in 2006/2007 had more risky sexual behavior than the population sampled by the DHS in 2005/2006 (Speizer et al 2007).…”

Targeting HIV Interventions for Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Southern Africa: Use of the PLACE Methodology in Hwange District, Zimbabwe

“…The PLACE method focuses on sites where new sexual partnerships are formed because the pattern of new partnerships in a community shapes its HIV epidemic Individuals with newly acquired HIV are also more infectious which is another reason why new partnerships are so important (Anderson and May 1988, Anderson 1999). The advantages of taking prevention interventions to public places include reaching individuals who may be at risk of transmitting the infection (but who are asymptomatic) and for reaching large numbers of individuals (Weir et al 2008). …”

Using Multiple Sampling Approaches to Measure Sexual Risk‐taking Among Young People in Haiti: Programmatic Implications

“…A randomized controlled trial is currently underway in Jamaica to test this methodology of targeting sites based on PLACE findings (Weir et al 2008). …”