2018
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized controlled trials and real-world data: differences and similarities to untangle literature data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
86
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Many other commercial and academic groups are developing smartphone apps for a wide variety of conditions that go beyond the simple direct-to-consumer market by seeking regulatory approval for their use in clinical contexts [17-19]. Unfortunately, not enough time has elapsed since the introduction of smartphone-based intervention apps to provide insight into their long-term repeated effects as well as their effects in real-world settings (ie, outside of clinical trials) [20-22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other commercial and academic groups are developing smartphone apps for a wide variety of conditions that go beyond the simple direct-to-consumer market by seeking regulatory approval for their use in clinical contexts [17-19]. Unfortunately, not enough time has elapsed since the introduction of smartphone-based intervention apps to provide insight into their long-term repeated effects as well as their effects in real-world settings (ie, outside of clinical trials) [20-22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing amount of information collected by registries, Electronic Health Records and the increasing use of sensors collecting in real time patients’ data, clinical research must evolve to take advantage of these new sources of information and implement them in routine practice 2 32. Given the exhaustive nature of clinical big data, they could be particularly interesting in the future to study rare diseases, rare outcomes and evaluate the efficacy of treatments in non-selected populations, which are difficult to assess in usual clinical trials 2 33. Omics is a growing field, particularly promising for personalised medicine as it supports the discovery of predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets 3 4 34.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…П р о г р е с с в р е в м а т о л о г и и в X X I в е к е Открытые исследования и регистры РПКИ занимают центральное место в медицине, основанной на доказательствах [96][97][98], однако использование «жестких» критериев «включения» и «исключения» затрудняет генерализацию полученных данных на всю популяцию пациентов, наблюдаемых в клинической практике. Эта проблема получила название «брешь эффективностирезультативности» (efficacy-effectiveness gap) [99], которая в определенной степени может быть преодолена материалами регистров пациентов, позволяющими составить более полное представление об истинном месте лекарственных препаратов [100][101][102][103][104], включая ТОФА [105], в реальной клинической практике.…”
Section: таблицаunclassified