2006
DOI: 10.1253/circj.70.667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Crossover Study of the Long-Term Effects of Pilsicainide and Cibenzoline in Preventing Recurrence of Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Influence of the Duration of Arrhythmia Before Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study has demonstrated that the recurrencefree rate of the patients treated with amiodarone therapy at 12 months in Group A was similar to that in Group B, which suggests that the efficacy of oral amiodarone therapy in preventing recurrence of AF was not affected by the duration of arrhythmia. In contrast, we reported that class I antiarrhythmic drugs, such as disopyramide and cibenzoline, showed less efficacy in preventing recurrence of AF in patients whose duration of tachycardia was 48 h or more compared with similar patients in whom the duration was less than 48 h. [9][10][11] Thus, amiodarone may have favorable pharmacological actions for preventing the recurrence of AF for which class I antiarrhythmic drugs are ineffective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present study has demonstrated that the recurrencefree rate of the patients treated with amiodarone therapy at 12 months in Group A was similar to that in Group B, which suggests that the efficacy of oral amiodarone therapy in preventing recurrence of AF was not affected by the duration of arrhythmia. In contrast, we reported that class I antiarrhythmic drugs, such as disopyramide and cibenzoline, showed less efficacy in preventing recurrence of AF in patients whose duration of tachycardia was 48 h or more compared with similar patients in whom the duration was less than 48 h. [9][10][11] Thus, amiodarone may have favorable pharmacological actions for preventing the recurrence of AF for which class I antiarrhythmic drugs are ineffective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classifications were diurnal type (07.00 h to 17.00 h), nocturnal type (17.00 h to 07.00 h next morning), and mixed type (symptoms appeared at any time). 9 Patients who had severe bradycardia (sick sinus syndrome, atrioventricular block, and intraventricular conduction distubance), hepatic or renal dysfunction observed as abnormal test results, those receiving -blockers, those who had asymptomatic AF, and women who may have become pregnant were excluded from the study population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Because atrial remodeling, including changes in the electrophysiological properties or atrial structure, may exaggerate the occurrence of AF, controlling this process should be one of the important issues in the management of clinical AF. There have been several reports focusing on preventing the progression of atrial electrical remodeling by various drugs, such as antiarrhythmic agents, 3,4 or angiotensin-receptor blockers. 5,6 Some have been reported as effective for the partial suppression of electrical remodeling, but a more important issue is the recovery of the electrophysiological properties after the promotion of electrical remodeling because most clinical therapies would be instituted after the appearance of AF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19) If sinus rhythm is not restored soon after the onset of AF, the efficacy of subsequent antiarrhythmic therapy will be reduced. 20,21) It is possible that treatment was less effective in the asymptomatic AF group than in the symptomatic AF group because recurrence of AF may not have been detected during follow-up as it did not cause subjective symptoms in the asymptomatic group. Furthermore, since the time of initial onset was unclear in patients with asymptomatic AF, it is possible that some patients were already resistant to antiarrhythmic drug therapy at their first hospital visit because of a long interval since onset of AF.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%