receiving plain aqueous gel than in those receiving lignocaine gel.However, in both studies the authors admitted a lack of statistical power because there were too few subjects in each subgroup. Moreover, the delivery time of lignocaine gel is a critical issue for pain perception during flexible cystoscopy [7]. Injection with lignocaine gel over a period of 10 s causes significantly less urethral discomfort than delivering it over 2 s. The delivery time in the two cited studies was 2 s in [3] and 3 s in [4]. Furthermore, it remains unanswered if the discomfort on delivery of a lubricant before cystoscopy contributes a relevant share to the overall discomfort from the entire instrumentation, e.g. pain from cystoscopy.
ANAESTHETIC EFFICACY OF LOCAL ANAESTHETIC LUBRICANT IN FLEXIBLE AND RIGID CYSTOSCOPYSeveral papers report studies of discomfort and pain during diagnostic cystoscopy [5,6,[8][9][10][11][12][13]. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, Birch et al. [5] examined the discomfort of flexible cystoscopy in 138 men; 10 mL of 2% lignocaine gel or 10 mL of plain aqueous gel were injected into the urethra 10-15 min before cystoscopy. Pain perception was evaluated immediately after cystoscopy using a VAS. Overall, the study showed no significant difference in pain perception between the groups. Patients having their first cystoscopy had a higher pain perception when plain aqueous gel was used. Because there were few patients in the subgroups (lignocaine gel, 32; plain aqueous gel 22), the differences were not statistically significant.Other studies of flexible cystoscopy in men, questioned the pain-reducing effect of lignocaine gel [8][9][10]. McFarlane et al. [8] randomized, in a double-blind, placebocontrolled trial, 60 men into three different groups, receiving 20 mL of placebo gel (group I), 10 mL of 2% lignocaine gel (group II) and 20 mL of 2% lignocaine gel (group III). Topical exposure over 15 min was secured by using a penile clamp. For pain perception there were no statistically significant differences among the three groups, with mean pain scores in groups I-III of 4.65, 3.93 and 3.57, respectively ( P = 0.406).In a randomized, double-blind study, Chen et al.[9] compared the pain-reducing effect of 20 mL 2% lignocaine gel (45 men) vs 20 mL plain aqueous gel (46 men) for flexible cystoscopy; the mean ( SD ) pain scores were similar in the two groups, at 2.8 (1.1) and 2.5 (1.1), respectively ( P = 0.06). In addition, the demand for analgesics after cystoscopy was evaluated; in the lignocaine group, 12 of 45 patients requested analgesics after instrumentation, compared with six of 46 patients having plain aqueous gel ( P = 0.103). Chen et al. [9] recommended studies with more patients, as the differences were not statistically significant. Stein et al. [6] stratified 236 men and women into four subgroups in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing lignocaine gel and plain aqueous gel, and intraurethral exposure times of 5 and 10 min before rigid cystoscopy. Pain scores measu...