2019
DOI: 10.1002/dac.4158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Kaczmarz algorithm for massive MIMO systems with channel estimation and spatial correlation

Abstract: Summary To exploit the benefits of massive multiple‐input multiple‐output (M‐MIMO) technology in scenarios where base stations (BSs) need to be cheap and equipped with simple hardware, the computational complexity of classical signal processing schemes for spatial multiplexing of users shall be reduced. This calls for suboptimal designs that perform well the combining/precoding steps and simultaneously achieve low computational complexities. An approach on the basis of the iterative Kaczmarz algorithm (KA) has… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation between sampling time and sampling frequency in fractional is ∆u∆t = 2 π sin( α ))/ N . When the transmitted signal interacted with the time‐varying frequency selective channel h , the received signal y in time domain is expressed as 9,15 yu()k=hu()k*xα()kej2πfdt+zu()k+iu()k, where * is convolution between channel and transmitted data, subscript () u denotes uplink, h u ∈∁ K XM is the time‐domain channel matrix between K transmitting antenna and M receiving antenna, x u ∈ ∁ Kx 1 is the transmitted signal form K single antenna user terminals, f d is Doppler frequency, z u ∈ ∁ MX 1 is independent identically distributed additive white Gaussian noise matrix with mean equal to 0, and i u ∈ ∁ MX 1 is self‐interference introduced due to frequency offset. By using the convolution theorem of FrFT, 16 the received signal can also be expressed in frequency domain as Yαu()k=expju2italicCot()α2Hαu()kXu()k+Zαu()k+Iαu()k, where ()Hαu=Fα()HK0.25emitalicXM is frequency domain channel matrix between K transmitting antenna and M receiving antenna, X u ∈ ∁ 1 xK is the frequency domain transmitted signal form K single antenna user terminals, ZαuitalicMX1 is frequency domain independent identically distributed additive white Gaussian noise matrix with mean equals to 0, and IαuitalicMX1 is self‐interference introduced due to frequency offset.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between sampling time and sampling frequency in fractional is ∆u∆t = 2 π sin( α ))/ N . When the transmitted signal interacted with the time‐varying frequency selective channel h , the received signal y in time domain is expressed as 9,15 yu()k=hu()k*xα()kej2πfdt+zu()k+iu()k, where * is convolution between channel and transmitted data, subscript () u denotes uplink, h u ∈∁ K XM is the time‐domain channel matrix between K transmitting antenna and M receiving antenna, x u ∈ ∁ Kx 1 is the transmitted signal form K single antenna user terminals, f d is Doppler frequency, z u ∈ ∁ MX 1 is independent identically distributed additive white Gaussian noise matrix with mean equal to 0, and i u ∈ ∁ MX 1 is self‐interference introduced due to frequency offset. By using the convolution theorem of FrFT, 16 the received signal can also be expressed in frequency domain as Yαu()k=expju2italicCot()α2Hαu()kXu()k+Zαu()k+Iαu()k, where ()Hαu=Fα()HK0.25emitalicXM is frequency domain channel matrix between K transmitting antenna and M receiving antenna, X u ∈ ∁ 1 xK is the frequency domain transmitted signal form K single antenna user terminals, ZαuitalicMX1 is frequency domain independent identically distributed additive white Gaussian noise matrix with mean equals to 0, and IαuitalicMX1 is self‐interference introduced due to frequency offset.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24] MATLAB has a strong matrix computing capability, and its programming environment is friendly, very suitable for the preparation and operation of all kinds of optimization algorithms. [25][26][27] Therefore, this article will combine the advantages of these two software to provide a hanger forces optimization allocation strategy based on AGA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rKA is an iterative algorithm that solves systems of linear equations (SLEs) and has been recently applied to efficiently tackle the problem of relaxing linear signal processing schemes in the context of M-MIMO. This procedure was first presented in [55] and deepened in [57,58]. The randomization in rKA is related to the order in which the SLE equations are being selected when solved.…”
Section: B3 Randomized Kaczmarz Signal Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contributions: Inspired by the promising results obtained for M-MIMO [55,57,58], this work proposes the application of the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm (rKA) as a way to circumvent the high-dimensional matrix inversion that comes with zero-forcing (ZF) and regularized zero-forcing (RZF) schemes when these are applied to recover the signal estimates of a crowded XL-MIMO scenario [8]. The contributions are listed as follows: (i) extension of rKA to resemble the performance of ZF and RZF schemes for a XL-MIMO system with a fixed number of subarrays; (ii) consideration of non-stationary properties through the concept of visibility regions (VRs) when taking into account two different power normalization methods of non-stationary channels [19]; (iii) exploitation of non-stationary features in the randomness design of rKA; (iv) complexity analysis considering the different random variants of the proposed algorithm.…”
Section: B1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation