2016 IEEE 36th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icdcs.2016.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Load Balancing in Finite Regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors provide upper bounds of the discard probability for when N, C, λ → ∞. Another study [29] used SQ(d) for a finite set N of M/M/1 queues. They provide numerical bounds on the delay and show that the delay can be quite different w.r.t the limit case.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors provide upper bounds of the discard probability for when N, C, λ → ∞. Another study [29] used SQ(d) for a finite set N of M/M/1 queues. They provide numerical bounds on the delay and show that the delay can be quite different w.r.t the limit case.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of randomized strategies including the schemes 1 and 2 presented in [5] can be viewed as CBS strategies. The first prominent randomized strategy was the power of two strategy [4], [13], which was also generalized to the power of d strategy or the so-called SQ(d) strategy [14], [15]. A survey of SQ(d)-type load balancing strategies for large systems is provided in [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This asymptotic estimate is remarkable, but it is not necessarily accurate for a finite number of servers. In this case, upper and lower bounds on the average delay are provided in [15]. Additionally, in [17] a bound for the queue lengths is estimated for the supermarket model under appropriate arrival rate scaling.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%