2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10878-013-9691-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized parameterized algorithms for $$P_2$$ P 2 -Packing and Co-Path Packing problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stages in the algorithm correspond to the small universes-we will have 1 + 1 stages, such that at stage 2 ≤ i ≤ 1 + 1, the element that we are "given" is the largest element in the piece U i−1 . 17 We still iterate over U in an ascending order (but now this is performed according to the new order-corresponding to the currently examined option that cut the universe), such that at stage i, when inserting a 3-set to partial solutions, we can remove its smallest element. However, at stage i, we can also remove from our partial solutions all the elements that are smaller than the given element; there should be enough such elements at each partial solution (according to a recursive formula that we discuss later), since if there are not, we simply discard the partial solution.…”
Section: C1 Intuitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stages in the algorithm correspond to the small universes-we will have 1 + 1 stages, such that at stage 2 ≤ i ≤ 1 + 1, the element that we are "given" is the largest element in the piece U i−1 . 17 We still iterate over U in an ascending order (but now this is performed according to the new order-corresponding to the currently examined option that cut the universe), such that at stage i, when inserting a 3-set to partial solutions, we can remove its smallest element. However, at stage i, we can also remove from our partial solutions all the elements that are smaller than the given element; there should be enough such elements at each partial solution (according to a recursive formula that we discuss later), since if there are not, we simply discard the partial solution.…”
Section: C1 Intuitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing O(6.75 k ) iterations of the process of random partition and constructing the bipartite graph, a P 2 -Packing of size k in G can be found with a high probability. Therefore, by putting the vertices of V into V 1 and V 2 with the probability 2/3 and 1/3, respectively, an O * (6.75 k )-time randomized algorithm can be obtained for the P 2 -packing problem [28][29] . We remark that the (2/3, 1/3) random partition for the P 2 -packing problem is the best possible for this simple strategy of partitioning the vertex set V of the input graph G into two disjoint subsets, one containing all 2k end-points of the P 2 's in P and the other containing all k mid-points of the P 2 's in P. Let f (x) = x 2k (1 − x) k , where 0 < x < 1.…”
Section: Dealing With a Small Unknown Subsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Chen et al (2011) gave an approximation algorithm with ratio 10/7 using local search and dynamic programming. Recently, randomized methods have been applied to get parameterized algorithms for many NP-hard problems Feng et al (2015), Chen and Feng (2014), Heggernes et al (2014). In this paper, we use random techniques to design parameterized algorithm for the Parameterized Co-path Set problem, which is defined as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%