2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(00)80088-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized phase III trial compared cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-P) versus cisplatin and vindesine (VDS-P) versus irinotecan alone (CPT) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) — The final report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin represents the standard of care in Japan based on Phase III trials conducted in that country. 26,27 We have previously reported a Phase I trial that combined escalating doses of CPT-11 with fixed doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel in 33 patients with advanced NSCLC. 28 The primary DLT of this regimen was diarrhea and neutropenia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin represents the standard of care in Japan based on Phase III trials conducted in that country. 26,27 We have previously reported a Phase I trial that combined escalating doses of CPT-11 with fixed doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel in 33 patients with advanced NSCLC. 28 The primary DLT of this regimen was diarrhea and neutropenia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%