2010
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.20.8199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Phase III Trial on Gemcitabine Versus Mytomicin in Recurrent Superficial Bladder Cancer: Evaluation of Efficacy and Tolerance

Abstract: This study demonstrates that GEM has better efficacy and lower toxicity than MMC; therefore, GEM appears as a logical candidate for intrabladder therapy in patients with refractory transitional cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
86
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…No patients in this study developed disease progression. Additionally, Addeo et al [18] , compared 6-week course of GEM with 4-week course of MMC in an RCT. Responders of the induction therapy further received maintenance therapy consisting of 10-monthly MMC treatments.…”
Section: Gemcitabinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…No patients in this study developed disease progression. Additionally, Addeo et al [18] , compared 6-week course of GEM with 4-week course of MMC in an RCT. Responders of the induction therapy further received maintenance therapy consisting of 10-monthly MMC treatments.…”
Section: Gemcitabinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many experimental modalities are now available for treating patients with superficial bladder cancer and optimized chemotherapy with MMC and GEM have shown some encouraging results (4). In a recent study by Addeo et al (16), the comparison of GEM and MMC shows that GEM has a better chemopreventive activity than MMC. The percentage of patients with recurrence on intravesical chemotherapy for GEM significantly differs from that observed in MMC-treated patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…80 By contrast, intravesical gemcitabine is particularly active in patients with intermediate risk papillary disease in whom BCG treatment has failed, even demonstrating superiority in comparison with mitomycin. 81,82 However, two studies of gemcitabine in BCGrefractory disease resulted in 2year durable responses of only 7% and 21%.…”
Section: Options After Bcg Failurementioning
confidence: 99%