2009
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.108.808402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations

Abstract: In most bifurcations with a significant stenosis in both branches, a provisional strategy of stenting the main branch only is effective, with the need to implant a second stent on the side branch occurring in approximately one third of cases. The implantation of 2 stents does not appear to be associated with a higher incidence of adverse events at 6 months.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
97
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 468 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
97
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus far, six randomised controlled trials (RCT) have compared the use of two stents versus a single-stent approach in the treatment of BL [15][16][17][18][19][20]. The BBC-ONE trial showed a clinical benefit favouring the single-stent technique, which was mainly driven by a reduction in periprocedural MI, of which clinical consequences are still a matter of debate [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, six randomised controlled trials (RCT) have compared the use of two stents versus a single-stent approach in the treatment of BL [15][16][17][18][19][20]. The BBC-ONE trial showed a clinical benefit favouring the single-stent technique, which was mainly driven by a reduction in periprocedural MI, of which clinical consequences are still a matter of debate [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported [8,10], bifurcation lesions were defined as presence of >50% diameter stenosis in a major epicardial coronary vessel, involving coronary bifurcation. Main vessel diameter had to be between 2.5 and 4.5 mm, while side branch had to be between 2.25 and 4.5 mm.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomes and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main-branch stenting associated with provisional side-branch stenting is the current strategic technique of choice in PCI for LMCA bifurcation lesions in selected patients [5,6,13].Using this procedure poses the challenge of acute SB occlusion, which occurs in about 6-15% of cases [7,8,14].While the crush stenting technique is useful to avoid such acute SB occlusion [9], it has a higher side-branch restenosis rate than the culotte stenting technique [10]. Consequently, the ballooncushion technique has been devised to incorporate the culotte stenting technique into an LMCA bifurcation intervention, using a 3-step procedure with the following rationales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent data from randomized and registry cohort studies suggest that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected LMCA stenosis is a feasible alternative to bypass surgery [1][2][3][4]. Main branch stenting associated with provisional sidebranch (SB) stenting is the current strategic technique of choice in PCI for bifurcation lesions [5,6]. Using this procedure in the complex setting of an LMCA true bifurcation, however, poses the challenge of acute sidebranch (SB) occlusion, which occurs in about 6-15% of cases and can potentially lead to catastrophic events, such as massive myocardial infarction or death [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%