1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63845-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Trial of Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin Compared With Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Carboplatin in Good-Prognosis Metastatic Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Cancer: A Multiinstitutional Medical Research Council/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial

Abstract: in the 298 allocated to CEB (log-rank x 2 = 2 6 .9 ; P < .001), which led to failure-free rates at 1 y e a r of 91% (95% confidence interval [Cl], 88% to 94%) and 77% (95% Cl, 72% to 82%), respectively. There w ere 10 deaths in patients allocated to BEP and 2 7 in patients allocated to CEB (log-rank x* = 8.77; P = .0 0 3 ), which led to 3-year survival rates of 97% (95% Cl, 95% to 99%) and 90% (95% Cl, 86% to 94% ), respectively.Conclusion: With these drug doses and schedules, combination chemotherapy based on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The time period over which our patients were treated spanned 26 years, during which time several different chemotherapy regimens were the standard of care. Although carboplatin‐based treatment has been shown to be inferior to cisplatin‐based regimens in seminoma and non‐seminomatous germ cell tumours [22,23], in patients with renal impairment precluding treatment with cisplatin, this still offers a curative option and should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time period over which our patients were treated spanned 26 years, during which time several different chemotherapy regimens were the standard of care. Although carboplatin‐based treatment has been shown to be inferior to cisplatin‐based regimens in seminoma and non‐seminomatous germ cell tumours [22,23], in patients with renal impairment precluding treatment with cisplatin, this still offers a curative option and should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard treatment of advanced NCGCTs is platinum (Williams et al, 1987;Nichols et al, 1991;Horwich et al, 1997;de Wit et al, 1998). Although the GCTs are highly treatable disease with platinum based combination regimens, cure cannot be achieved in 20-30% of patients with advanced disease with first line chemotherapy (Ataergin et al, 2007;Keskin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite higher toxicity none of these experimental regimens as part of first-line therapy improves outcome in patients with advanced disease and this approach is currently not recommended for patients poor risk (Kaye et al, 1998;Droz et al, 2007;Motzer et al, 2007;Daugaard et al, 2011). , 1997;Mazumdar et al, 2001). In our multicenter study which included patients with stage 2 and 3 NSGCTs, 5 years OS rates were 92% and 55% and 5 years DFS rates were 83% and 33%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carboplatin as monotherapy is insufficient even for a pure seminoma [23]. Also when given within a combination regimen in case of non‐seminoma, the use of carboplatin results in an inferior cure rate [24]. Furthermore, no secondary resection was performed after completion of chemotherapy despite the presence of mature teratoma in the primary histology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%