2002
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.15.1143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Trial of Breast Irradiation Schedules After Lumpectomy for Women With Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract: The more convenient 22-day fractionation schedule appears to be an acceptable alternative to the 35-day schedule.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
362
1
17

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 596 publications
(386 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
362
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment plans were available in DICOMRT or RTOG electronic formats with full CT planning for 469 patients (51.2% of 915) from 11 centres, and of these, 390 (83.1% of 469) had a score for change in photographic breast appearance at 2 years available, forming the dataset for analysis in this study. Reasons for the 2-year photographic score being unavailable were breast reconstruction (1), recurrence or second primary (3), died (4), emigrated or moved (3), no baseline photograph (17), patient not seen at 2 years (6), 2-year photograph not taken (3), patient withdrew from photographic study (4) and reason unknown (38).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Treatment plans were available in DICOMRT or RTOG electronic formats with full CT planning for 469 patients (51.2% of 915) from 11 centres, and of these, 390 (83.1% of 469) had a score for change in photographic breast appearance at 2 years available, forming the dataset for analysis in this study. Reasons for the 2-year photographic score being unavailable were breast reconstruction (1), recurrence or second primary (3), died (4), emigrated or moved (3), no baseline photograph (17), patient not seen at 2 years (6), 2-year photograph not taken (3), patient withdrew from photographic study (4) and reason unknown (38).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiotherapy and Oncology 104 (2012) 143-147 The routine use of hypofractionation in breast radiotherapy is supported by outcome data of four large randomised clinical trials in women with early breast cancer [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Residual concerns include the impact of dose inhomogeneity on the risk of adverse effects after hypofractionated schedules, so-called 'treble trouble' [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying cell and molecular processes that explain these differences are not clear, but a mechanistic understanding is not needed to apply the linear-quadratic model safely and effectively. Over the last 20 years, several randomized trials involving a combined total of >7,000 women compared hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy to a standard regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (Tables 1 and 2) (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). UK Royal Marsden Hospital/Gloucestershire Oncology Centre (RMH/GOC) and Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy Trial A (START A) trials tested two dose levels of a 13-fraction regimen in terms of late adverse effects and tumor control; the study design allowed direct estimates of a/b for each trial (15)(16)(17).…”
Section: What Recent Trials Showmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UK Royal Marsden Hospital/Gloucestershire Oncology Centre (RMH/GOC) and Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy Trial A (START A) trials tested two dose levels of a 13-fraction regimen in terms of late adverse effects and tumor control; the study design allowed direct estimates of a/b for each trial (15)(16)(17). Based on a combined total of 278 local-regional tumor relapses in the two trials, the adjusted a/b value for tumor control was 4.6 Gy (95% (14,19). Schedules are expected to be equivalent in terms of late normal tissue and tumor responses assuming an a/b value of 3.0 Gy for each and no influence of treatment time.…”
Section: What Recent Trials Showmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same evaluation, the circumference of the treated arm was measured (treated arm 15 cm above the lateral epicondyle) and compared with that of the contralateral arm. [28][29][30][31][32][33] …”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%