2013
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Trial of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy With Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Alone for Removal of Bile Duct Stones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
118
3
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
118
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were observed in the trial conducted by Kim et al [21]. In 2013, Teoh and colleagues compared the two approaches and evaluated end points of duct clearance, the use of ML, and hospitalization costs [22]. Randomizing 156 patients, they found no difference in the stone clearance rate (ES versus ESBD: 88.5 versus 89.0%, NS), more use of ML in the ES group (46.2% versus 28.8%, P = 0.028), and lower costs with ESBD (P = 0.034).…”
Section: Combination Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Similar results were observed in the trial conducted by Kim et al [21]. In 2013, Teoh and colleagues compared the two approaches and evaluated end points of duct clearance, the use of ML, and hospitalization costs [22]. Randomizing 156 patients, they found no difference in the stone clearance rate (ES versus ESBD: 88.5 versus 89.0%, NS), more use of ML in the ES group (46.2% versus 28.8%, P = 0.028), and lower costs with ESBD (P = 0.034).…”
Section: Combination Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Four randomized controlled trials comparing the overall complication rates (pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation) of sphincteroplasty and sphincterotomy [21][22][23][24] found no significant difference between the two techniques. In our study, the complication rate was 6.8% only in the form of bleeding without pancreatitis or perforation.…”
Section: Complication Rate Of Sphincteroplastymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dansl ap lupart des études, le recours à une LM aprèsS MSO est réduit par rapport à la SE [18]. Dans L'étude de Stefanidis et al [7] et comme ce fut le cas dans la nôtre, aucune LM n'a été nécessaire aprèsS MSO.U nessaic ontrôlé randomisé trouveu ne diminution significatived el an é cessité d'une LM dans le groupe SMSO vs groupe SE (28,8 %v s4 6,2 %, p=0,028), en particulier pour les calculs de plus de 15 mm (58,1 %v s9 0,9 %, p=0,002) [19]. Selon une étude récente prospectivem ulticentrique randomisées ur 150 patients comparant l'efficacité de la SMSO à celle de la SE en cas de macrolithiase de la VBP,l et aux de succès de la SMSO était supérieur par rapport au groupe SE+LM (96 %v s6 2% , p <0,001) pour un coûte tu ne duréed ep rocédure moindres (respectivement 477 vs 623 euros, p=0,03 et 39 ± 23 min vs 50 ± 18, p= 0,015) pour des calculs comparables en taille et en nombre montrant ainsi que la SMSO doit être considéréecomme le traitement de première intention des patients présentant des macrocalculs de la VBP non extirpables après SE [20].…”
Section: Patients Et Méthodesunclassified