2007
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.737312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Trial of Genotype-Guided Versus Standard Warfarin Dosing in Patients Initiating Oral Anticoagulation

Abstract: Background-Pharmacogenetic-guided dosing of warfarin is a promising application of "personalized medicine" but has not been adequately tested in randomized trials. Methods and Results-Consenting patients (nϭ206) being initiated on warfarin were randomized to pharmacogeneticguided or standard dosing. Buccal swab DNA was genotyped for CYP2C9 *2 and CYP2C9 *3 and VKORC1 C1173T with a rapid assay. Standard dosing followed an empirical protocol, whereas pharmacogenetic-guided dosing followed a regression equation i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
484
4
13

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 630 publications
(515 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
14
484
4
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Algorithms were selected based on the following criteria: the algorithms that included nongenetic or genetic variables not available in our study, and included only a minority of clinical variables, and were based on relatively small clinical populations were excluded; algorithms that were derived from Asian with the consideration of race of each algorithm made up of at least 15% Asians in original populations, and algorithms validated best in Asians were included. This process identified eight algorithms [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The characteristics and equations of selected algorithms are listed in Supporting Information Tables II and III. Collection of subjects and clinical data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Algorithms were selected based on the following criteria: the algorithms that included nongenetic or genetic variables not available in our study, and included only a minority of clinical variables, and were based on relatively small clinical populations were excluded; algorithms that were derived from Asian with the consideration of race of each algorithm made up of at least 15% Asians in original populations, and algorithms validated best in Asians were included. This process identified eight algorithms [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The characteristics and equations of selected algorithms are listed in Supporting Information Tables II and III. Collection of subjects and clinical data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the interest of determining an accurate predictive pharmacogenetic algorithm to promote rational treatment, especially for Chinese outliers, we attempted to assess the predictive ability of published warfarin pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms in Mainland Han Chinese [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Accuracy Assessment Of Pharmacogenetic Algorithms For Warfarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true with warfarin due to additional factors, such as diet, concurrent medications, and medical indication that alter dosing requirements. These factors complicate prescribers' decisions, especially on how to dose the medication and make it difficult to further assess the impact of genetic information [24].…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true with warfarin due to additional factors, such as diet, concurrent medications, and medical indication that alter dosing requirements. These factors complicate prescribers' decisions, especially on how to dose the medication and make it difficult to further assess the impact of genetic information [24].While some CDSS assessments have applied pharmacogenomics, these were often limited in scope and generally did not recommend a specific dose [25,26]. To develop CDSS interfaces, a number of methods have been identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,13,15,16 To date however, clinical trials have not consistently demonstrated that dose prediction using warfarin algorithms improves anticoagulant control or patient outcomes compared to other methods. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] For this reason, neither the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) 24 nor the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH) 25 consensus guideline advocate the use of dose prediction tools or genotyping prior to the initiation of therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%