Randomized Trial of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in Primary Renal Transplantation With Tacrolimus and Steroid Avoidance: Four-Year Analysis
Abstract:This is the first long-term, randomized trial comparing enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil along with reduced maintenance tacrolimus dosing and steroid avoidance, which resulted in similarly low-BPAR rates, acceptably high renal function at 48 months, and an equivalent side effect profile.
“…14 Current literature has debated whether MMF or MPS offers a better side effect profile. 27,28 All patients in this study were initially placed on MMF. One patient was switched to MPS secondary to hypokalemia, myalgia, insomnia, and anorexia.…”
Treatment of MMP with MMF in this uncontrolled case series resulted in control of inflammation in the majority of patients with minimal side effects. Our data support consideration of MMF as an initial treatment option for active ocular MMP.
“…14 Current literature has debated whether MMF or MPS offers a better side effect profile. 27,28 All patients in this study were initially placed on MMF. One patient was switched to MPS secondary to hypokalemia, myalgia, insomnia, and anorexia.…”
Treatment of MMP with MMF in this uncontrolled case series resulted in control of inflammation in the majority of patients with minimal side effects. Our data support consideration of MMF as an initial treatment option for active ocular MMP.
“…We were therefore interested in determining the prognostic impact of NODAT among patients receiving transplants at our centre. To maximise statistical power, we combined data for all study participants in four randomised immunosuppression trials of adult, primary kidney transplantation performed at our centre since May 2000 [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], yielding a prospectively followed cohort of 628 patients. Results from this observational study are presented here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: NCT00681213, NCT00685061, NCT00681343, NCT00533624 and NCT01172418; note: two distinct registration numbers exist in the second trial, because separate randomisations of deceased donor and living donor recipients were performed). Results of these randomised trials have been reported previously (details omitted here) [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
“…This may help alleviate some of the gastrointestinal side effects of mycophenolate mofetil. There is no significant difference in rejection and side effects in large randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus mycophenolate sodium (Ciancio et al, 2011). The ability of mycophenolic acid to facilitate sparing of other immunosuppressive agents, particularly cyclosporine and its related nephrotoxicity, is promising.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.