“…Following this, 655 records were excluded based on irrelevancy and duplicity, leaving a total of 46 papers to be examined. In addition, six studies were excluded because the intervention focused on health consequences of UV exposure (Cheng, Guan, Cao, Liu, & Zhai, ; Dykstra, ; Hernandez et al ., ; Lazovich et al ., ; Olson, Gaffney, Starr, & Dietrich, [included in the Williams, et al . () review]; Thomas et al ., ), three due to not examining relevant research questions (Cox et al ., ; Hillhouse, Turrisi, Stapleton, & Robinson, ; Walsh, Stock, Peterson, & Gerrard, ), and seven for not containing an intervention (Cheetham & Ogden, ; Hillhouse et al ., ; Noar et al ., ; Pagoto et al ., ; Taylor, Westbrook, & Chang, ; Welch, Chang, & Taylor, ; Williams et al., 2013).…”