2003
DOI: 10.1086/377288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Trial to Evaluate Indinavir/Ritonavir versus Saquinavir/Ritonavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1–Infected Patients: The MaxCmin1 Trial

Abstract: This trial assessed the rate of virological failure at 48 weeks in adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected patients assigned indinavir/ritonavir (Idv/Rtv; 800/100 mg 2 times daily) or saquinavir/ritonavir (Sqv/Rtv; 1000/100 mg 2 times daily) in an open-label, randomized (1:1), multicenter, phase 4 design. Three hundred six patients began the assigned treatment. At 48 weeks, virological failure was seen in 43 (27%) of 158 and 37 (25%) of 148 patients in the Idv/Rtv and Sqv/Rtv arms, respectivel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

7
98
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
98
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant differences could be found between plasma SQV levels and gender, weight, or the presence of hepatitis and/or cirrhosis, except for a slight trend toward higher SQV C min levels in cirrhotic patients. The efficacy in the ITT analysis in our series (69.5%) is lower than that reported with the 1,600/100-mg once-daily regimen and similar to that observed in the MaxCmin2 trial with a 1,000/100 twice-daily dose (2,12,13,16,26). However, only five patients (3.3%) had virological failure despite adequate C min levels but with a confirmed poor adherence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No significant differences could be found between plasma SQV levels and gender, weight, or the presence of hepatitis and/or cirrhosis, except for a slight trend toward higher SQV C min levels in cirrhotic patients. The efficacy in the ITT analysis in our series (69.5%) is lower than that reported with the 1,600/100-mg once-daily regimen and similar to that observed in the MaxCmin2 trial with a 1,000/100 twice-daily dose (2,12,13,16,26). However, only five patients (3.3%) had virological failure despite adequate C min levels but with a confirmed poor adherence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The efficacy of this dosage has been proved as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), although the required pill burden and dosing frequency are disadvantageous factors for adherence (15,33). Since nonresistant viruses require lower PI concentrations in plasma to be inhibited (33) and a relationship among dose, exposure, and response to SQV has been demonstrated (18), we decided to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the lowest pharmacokinetically assayed SQVr dosage (1,200/100 mg once daily) in treatment-naive or limited PI-experienced HIV-infected patients on the basis of plasma pharmacokinetic data but also assessing intracellular concentrations (the true effect compartment of SQV).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, hyperlipidaemia was observed when RTV was used at a dosage of 100 mg twice daily to boost both indinavir 800 mg twice daily and saquinavir 1000 mg twice daily in the MaxCMin1 study [17]. Ritonavir, given at a dosage 200 mg once daily plus fosamprenavir 1400 mg once daily, was associated with higher rates of hypertriglyceridaemia than was NFV 1250 mg twice daily in the SOLO Study [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical efficacy has been observed with this dosage in trials as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) (9). Pharmacoenhancement of protease inhibitors (PIs) with lowdose ritonavir due to the potent inhibition of CYP3A4 (18) has been extensively reported (1,8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%