2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Range expansion of an already widespread bee under climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ranges in North America and Europe have contracted because they failed to move northward as southern sections of their range became too warm (Kerr et al, 2015; Sirois‐Delisle & Kerr, 2018). However, other taxa, such as Ceratina australensis , an arid‐adapted, Australian species, should expand their range under future climate conditions, in this case, due to increasing area of arid habitat (Dew et al, 2019). Physiological differences may be particularly important in determining the response of species to altered climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ranges in North America and Europe have contracted because they failed to move northward as southern sections of their range became too warm (Kerr et al, 2015; Sirois‐Delisle & Kerr, 2018). However, other taxa, such as Ceratina australensis , an arid‐adapted, Australian species, should expand their range under future climate conditions, in this case, due to increasing area of arid habitat (Dew et al, 2019). Physiological differences may be particularly important in determining the response of species to altered climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results and approach of our study may be helpful for the prevention and early detection of invasive insects, namely bees, in determining suitable niches outside of their native range. The development of SDMs is a useful approach in determining how bees and other insects will expand outside of their native niche [ 1 , 45 , 59 ]. However, it is also clear that there are limitations to SDMs in predicting the invasive spread of bees, as evidenced by data collected during ground surveys of invasive A. manicatum in northeastern North America [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are other potential issues such as environmental variables used in the analysis, modeling algorithm, GCMs, collinearity, model complexity, model evaluation method, and threshold values to produce binary maps that can influence model outcomes. In addition, future land use (e.g., road building) change scenarios can also alter future species distributions [ 1 , 17 ]. Improvements of models based on natural history and ecological information and increased availability of specimen data are crucial issues for enhancing the predictive accuracy of the models [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our results show that the composition of bee assemblages in forests with secondary growth (regenerating forests) can be affected by climatic variations of microenvironments, even in fragments close to forest remnants, and this fact can be evidenced by the important influence of the climatic conditions in the composition of the bee communities studied here. About this issue, we can highlight that in the regenerating forest, the climatic variations were more prominent than in the mature forest with higher air temperatures, wind speed and sunlight, and even despite the significant effects of microclimates on the composition of bee assemblages between forests, most species appear to forage in all micro-environments, as the same 17 species of bees were sampled from both forests (see Appendix 1, Fig 6), no restrictions on microclimate variation, and this may indicate that some wild bee taxa can better cope with local climatic changes and disturbances (Switanek et al, 2017;Hunt et al, 2018;Dew et al, 2019;Sobreiro et al, 2019). In addition, other species of bees have indicated restrictions to more conserved or altered sites, being that 18 species of bees were exclusively sampled in the mature forest, while 5 species were exclusive in the regenerating forest (see Appendix 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%