2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.585244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Range image registration for industrial inspection

Abstract: Building of three-dimensional models is an important topic in computer vision. Range finders only let to reconstruct a partial view of the object. However, in most part of applications a full reconstruction is required. Many authors have proposed several techniques to register 3D surfaces from multiple views. In this paper, a survey of the most common techniques is presented. Furthermore experimental results are performed, and a 3D model is obtained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Habib and Al-Ruzouq [11], a comprehensive registration process should address four issues: (1) the transformation parameters relating the involved datasets to a common reference frame, (2) the registration primitives used for the estimation of the transformation parameters, (3) the mathematical constraint describing the similarity metric between conjugate features after registration, and (4) the matching strategy controlling the framework for the automatic registration process. Depending on the final accuracy of the estimated transformation parameters, existing procedures can be categorized as either coarse or fine registration techniques [12]. Coarse registration is commonly used to establish rough alignment between the involved point clouds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Habib and Al-Ruzouq [11], a comprehensive registration process should address four issues: (1) the transformation parameters relating the involved datasets to a common reference frame, (2) the registration primitives used for the estimation of the transformation parameters, (3) the mathematical constraint describing the similarity metric between conjugate features after registration, and (4) the matching strategy controlling the framework for the automatic registration process. Depending on the final accuracy of the estimated transformation parameters, existing procedures can be categorized as either coarse or fine registration techniques [12]. Coarse registration is commonly used to establish rough alignment between the involved point clouds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several local registration methods with a higher accuracy have been proposed. Some studies [ 13 , 14 ] provide an overview of the fine and coarse registration methods. According to Reference [ 14 ], there are four types of local registration methods: the ICP method, Chen’s method [ 15 , 16 ], signed distance fields [ 17 ], and genetic algorithms [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of automatically registering two scans was achieved with a wide variety of methods [7]. Most of these extract sets of feature points, which are automatically matched to recover a good approximation of T .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%