2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10764-010-9461-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rank-Related Fitness Differences and Their Demographic Pathways in Semi-Free-Ranging Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta)

Abstract: Researchers have explored the fitness consequences of female dominance hierarchies in many primate populations, with most studies highlighting differences in age of maturation, fertility, and offspring survival. We use resampling techniques and van Tienderen's (2000) elasticity path analysis to identify rank-related differences in finite rate of increase (λ) and their demographic correlates among segments of a semi-free-ranging rhesus macaque population. Higher-ranking population segments grew at greater rates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in density are clearly identifiable because it is a closed island population. More importantly, this primate population exhibits a high annual population growth rate (λ > 1:10; Rawlins and Kessler 1986; Blomquist et al 2011; Kessler et al 2015) and exists frequently at relatively high densities where population dynamics are regulated by reduced reproduction (Hernández-Pacheco et al 2013, 2016a). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in density are clearly identifiable because it is a closed island population. More importantly, this primate population exhibits a high annual population growth rate (λ > 1:10; Rawlins and Kessler 1986; Blomquist et al 2011; Kessler et al 2015) and exists frequently at relatively high densities where population dynamics are regulated by reduced reproduction (Hernández-Pacheco et al 2013, 2016a). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrilineal rank is thus a meaningful proxy of individual rank within the group (e.g. Blomquist et al, 2011). In categorizing matrilines as high ranking (the top two matrilineal clusters in the study group) or low ranking (all other females, not directly related to the high-ranking clusters) we relied on outcomes from decided female-female agonistic interactions collected in Group S in 2012 (Mandalaywala et al, 2014).…”
Section: Dominance Rank Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socially dominant rhesus macaques live longer than their subordinate counterparts (Blomquist et al, 2011). Likewise, low social status is associated with increased mortality in the human population (Adler, 2009, Adler et al, 1994).…”
Section: Direct Comparisons Between Social Subordination Stress and Dmentioning
confidence: 99%