2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40687-016-0077-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rankin–Eisenstein classes in Coleman families

Abstract: We show that the Euler system associated with Rankin-Selberg convolutions of modular forms, introduced in our earlier works with Lei and Kings, varies analytically as the modular forms vary in p-adic Coleman families. We prove an explicit reciprocity law for these families and use this to prove cases of the Bloch-Kato conjecture for Rankin-Selberg convolutions.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
103
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…] . For the reverse inequality, one can employ an argument involving Euler systems of Beilinson-Flach elements constructed by Loeffler-Zerbes in [34]. Under some technical hypotheses, such an Euler system is constructed and used to prove this direction of the main conjecture in [ For the remainder of this section, it will be helpful to keep the following picture in mind:…”
Section: Two-variable Main Conjectures and Two Variable P-adic L-funcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…] . For the reverse inequality, one can employ an argument involving Euler systems of Beilinson-Flach elements constructed by Loeffler-Zerbes in [34]. Under some technical hypotheses, such an Euler system is constructed and used to prove this direction of the main conjecture in [ For the remainder of this section, it will be helpful to keep the following picture in mind:…”
Section: Two-variable Main Conjectures and Two Variable P-adic L-funcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approach also uses syntomic cohomology to obtain the result for many specialisations of the family, and analytic continuation to obtain the result everywhere; but there is a significant difference between their proof and ours, in that they analytically continue from specialisations of weight 2 and high p-power level, rather than high weight and prime-to-p level as in our approach. Thus their strategy requires a delicate study of the special fibres of the modular curves X 1 (N p r ) in characteristic p, which is not needed in our approach; and our method is also amenable to generalisations to non-ordinary Coleman families, as we shall show in a subsequent paper [LZ16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover we remark that our methods are amenable to being generalized to Hilbert modular forms. This is a big difference with Kato's Euler system used in [22] or the Euler system of Rankin-Eisenstein classes used in [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%