2014
DOI: 10.1090/pspum/088/01457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rankin-Selberg methods for closed string amplitudes

Abstract: After integrating over supermoduli and vertex operator positions, scattering amplitudes in superstring theory at genus h ≤ 3 are reduced to an integral of a Siegel modular function of degree h on a fundamental domain of the Siegel upper half plane. A direct computation is in general unwieldy, but becomes feasible if the integrand can be expressed as a sum over images under a suitable subgroup of the Siegel modular group: if so, the integration domain can be extended to a simpler domain at the expense of keepin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, p. In this representation, modular invariance is manifest, since a transformation Ω → (AΩ + B)(CΩ + D) −1 (A.2) can be compensated by a linear transformation (n, m) → (n, m) D ⊺ −B ⊺ −C ⊺ D ⊺ , y 1 → y 1 · (CΩ + D), under which the third line of (4.7) transforms as a weight p−q 2 modular form. We can therefore compute the integral using the orbit method [60,61,62,63,64], namely decompose the sum over (n, m) into various orbits under Sp(4, Z), and for each orbit O, retain the contribution of a particular element ς ∈ O at the expense of extending the integration domain F 2 = Sp(4, Z)\H 2 to Γ ς \H 2 , where Γ ς is the stabilizer of ς in Sp(4, Z). The integration domain is unfolded according to the formula γ∈Γς \Sp(4,Z)…”
Section: Even Self-dual Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, p. In this representation, modular invariance is manifest, since a transformation Ω → (AΩ + B)(CΩ + D) −1 (A.2) can be compensated by a linear transformation (n, m) → (n, m) D ⊺ −B ⊺ −C ⊺ D ⊺ , y 1 → y 1 · (CΩ + D), under which the third line of (4.7) transforms as a weight p−q 2 modular form. We can therefore compute the integral using the orbit method [60,61,62,63,64], namely decompose the sum over (n, m) into various orbits under Sp(4, Z), and for each orbit O, retain the contribution of a particular element ς ∈ O at the expense of extending the integration domain F 2 = Sp(4, Z)\H 2 to Γ ς \H 2 , where Γ ς is the stabilizer of ς in Sp(4, Z). The integration domain is unfolded according to the formula γ∈Γς \Sp(4,Z)…”
Section: Even Self-dual Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the genus 2 modular integral, viewing SO(5, 5, Z) as the T-duality group in D = 5, we have to study the limit when the volume V 5 /l 5 s is scaled to infinity, and extract the term of order (r 4 /l 7 ) 3 = (V 5 /l 5 s ) 6/5 . The torus decompactification limit can be analyzed by applying the orbit method on the genus 2 Narain partition function Γ 5,5,2 , following [44]. The zero and rank one orbits reproduce the O(r 5 4 ) and O(r 4 4 ) terms in (B.46), while the rank 2 orbits contributes to the O(r 3 4 ) term.…”
Section: Dimensional Regularization: a Puzzlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in (A.1), the integral diverges if d ≥ h + 1, and must be regularized. A regularization scheme was described in detail for 1 ≤ h ≤ 3 in [46], and is easily generalized to arbitrary h. The regularized integral can then be expressed as a residue at s = d−3 2 of the maximal parabolic Eisenstein series E D d sΛ h attached to the rank h antisymmetric representation [46,53], or as a residue at s = h of the maximal parabolic Eisenstein series attached to the spinor representations [7].…”
Section: A2 Genus H Modular Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%