Ranking All DEA-Efficient DMUs Based on Cross Efficiency and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods

Akbarian, Dariush

doi:10.1155/2015/594727

Cited by 11 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ahora bien, como señala Ley (1991) cuando a una unidad se le asigna una puntuación 1 porque únicamente se ha comparado consigo misma, su eficiencia resulta "sospechosa". En tal caso, la frecuencia con que estas unidades eficientes aparecen como referentes de las ineficientes es un buen criterio, aunque no el único (Akbarian, 2015), para delimitar su verdadera condición de eficiencia. Si este número es elevado, la unidad correspondiente es genuinamente eficiente con respecto a un buen número de unidades.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

¿está Justificada La Mala Imagen De La Administración De Justicia Española? ¿es Un Problema De Inversión?: Una Comparativa Europea Mediante El Análisis Dea

Cueto

López²

2017

ReE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La justicia es un bien público y, en consecuencia, en el seno de la Administración Pública, el correcto funcionamiento de la Administración de Justicia tiene capital importancia para una sociedad. En la actualidad, el sistema judicial español es objeto de severas críticas, que lo califican de ineficiente y tardío. Un gran sector social y profesional de la Administración de Justicia considera que la falta de medios es la causa de su mal funcionamiento, y reclaman mayor inversión. En este trabajo analizamos si ambas aseveraciones son acertadas: si es ineficiente la Administración de Justicia española y si un mayor gasto conllevaría a la mejora de este servicio público. Aplicando la metodología de Análisis Envolvente de Datos (DEA), determinamos la eficiencia de la Administración de Justicia española en relación con otras Administraciones de Justicia europeas y, mediante el análisis tobit, relacionamos las puntuaciones DEA y el gasto público. Nuestros resultados concluyen que un mayor esfuerzo en el gasto conllevará a una mejor posición. ABSTRACTJustice is a public good. Therefore, within the core of the Public Administration, the proper functioning of the Judicial Administration is of utmost importance to society. Currently, the Spanish Judicial System is being subject to sharp criticism that qualifies it as inefficient and belated. A large social and professional sector of the Judicial Administration considers that the lack of means is the reason behind its poor functioning and so, they demand greater investment. Throughout this paper the accuracy of both assertions will be analysed: whether the Spanish Judicial Administration is inefficient and whether a greater expenditure would lead to the improvement of such public service. By applying the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology, the efficiency of the Spanish Judicial Administration is determined and compared to that of other European Judicial Administrations. Through the Tobit analysis, the DEA levels are related to the public spending. Our outcomes show that a greater expenditure effort will result into a better ranking position.

show abstract

Section: Resultsunclassified

¿está Justificada La Mala Imagen De La Administración De Justicia Española? ¿es Un Problema De Inversión?: Una Comparativa Europea Mediante El Análisis Dea

Cueto

López²

2017

ReE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In conclusion, the calculating procedures for solving quantitative multiple-objective decision problems can be concluded as follows [24,25]:…”

Section: Definition Of Constraint Conditionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design Optimization of a Disc Brake Based on a Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm and Analytic Hierarchy Process Method

Zhou

Gao

Wang

et al. 2019

TFAMENA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multiple optimization objectives and the Pareto set often arise from engineering structural optimization. Normalization methods (such as the weighting method) have the disadvantage that the weighted value is not set by the decision maker but the designer and is greatly influenced by the opinion of the designer. On this basis, in this paper a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-analytic hierarchy process (NSGA-AHP) method is proposed for decision making and analysis of the Pareto solution set of the multiple-objective optimization in a structural optimal model. In addition, illustrated by the example of a disc brake, a multiple-objective optimization model for a disc brake has been here developed. Besides, the NSGA-AHP method is adopted for the analysis optimization. The research results show that the NSGA-AHP method can be utilized to select the Pareto solution set in an effective way and that this method is effective in solving a multiple-objective problem in the structural optimization design.

show abstract

“…Mousa. G. A (2015) [5] examined the efficiency of the banking sector in the Bahrain Bourse using financial ratio analysis (FRA) and DEA. For FRA, the current study has used six ratios to evaluate three characteristics of banks' efficiency (Profitability; Liquidity and Risk).…”

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

Financial Performance Ranking of Nationalized Banks Through Integrated Ahm-Gra-Dea Method

Raju¹,

Rao²

2019

IJPTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Ranking All DEA-Efficient DMUs Based on Cross Efficiency and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods

Cited by 11 publications

References 35 publications

¿está Justificada La Mala Imagen De La Administración De Justicia Española? ¿es Un Problema De Inversión?: Una Comparativa Europea Mediante El Análisis Dea

¿está Justificada La Mala Imagen De La Administración De Justicia Española? ¿es Un Problema De Inversión?: Una Comparativa Europea Mediante El Análisis Dea

Design Optimization of a Disc Brake Based on a Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm and Analytic Hierarchy Process Method

Financial Performance Ranking of Nationalized Banks Through Integrated Ahm-Gra-Dea Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About