2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00182-013-0383-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking asymmetric auctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the opposite holds for large values of K. Using a different approximation technique, Fibich and Gavish [6] provided an example in which it is also the case that s falls below the common mean. This observation is also consistent with Gavious and Minchuk [10] who noted that if both bidders' distributions are "almost" uniform, small asymmetries between them will tend to suppress s. In comparison, if the two bidders are symmetric, then it is well known that s will equal the mean of the distribution.…”
Section: Proof See the Appendixsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the opposite holds for large values of K. Using a different approximation technique, Fibich and Gavish [6] provided an example in which it is also the case that s falls below the common mean. This observation is also consistent with Gavious and Minchuk [10] who noted that if both bidders' distributions are "almost" uniform, small asymmetries between them will tend to suppress s. In comparison, if the two bidders are symmetric, then it is well known that s will equal the mean of the distribution.…”
Section: Proof See the Appendixsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In figure 2, we plot the absolute differences in the approximate equilibrium inverse-bid functionsD 1,2 (s) when the order of the approximating polynomials K increases from three to five to twenty-five. 10 We denote by s K the approximated high bid in the case when an order K polynomial is used to approximate the equilibrium inverse-bid functions. When K equals three, the absolute difference in the approximate equilibrium inverse-bid functions and the theoretical absolute difference coincide exactly.…”
Section: Proof See the Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some particular distributions, revenue in a FPA is higher than in a SPA (see, e.g., Maskin and Riley, 2000). This ranking does not always hold, as Gavious and Minchuk (2014) show that revenue in a SPA can be higher than that in a FPA under asymmetry.…”
Section: Revenue Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Nevertheless, even for two bidders with asymmetrically drawn valuations from the same support, no general closed-form solution is known. The first-price and second-price auctions no longer yield the same revenue under asymmetric value distributions, with the revenue ranking depending on the asymmetry of the value distributions (Maskin and Riley, 2000;Cantillon, 2008;Gavious and Minchuk, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the binary setting with equal low values, Maskin and Riley (1983) show that the SPA is better than the FPA if the bidders' high values are approximately equal, or if the probabilities of a high value are approximately equal. Gavious and Minchuk (2013) study environments such that the valuations' distributions are close to the uniform distribution and in this framework they identify cases in which the SPA dominates the FPA.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%