Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best–Worst scaling method

Abstract

Purpose The number of studies on the use of choice cues in the purchase decision of a smartphone does not appear to be extensive, given the size and rate of growth of the market. Surprisingly, it appears that no study of this type in the Chinese context has been undertaken. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to fill the existing gap in the marketing literature in this area. Design/methodology/approach Best–Worst (BW) scaling method was used in the study. It is suggested that the method overcomes some of the biases commonly found in surveys where Likert-type scales are used, and it has superior discriminating power, because respondents are asked to rank the most and the least important factor from a group, and are thereby forced to make tradeoffs between factors. Findings Among the 13 choice cues, connectivity, price and memory capacity are found to be the most important, whereas recommendation from others, ease of handling and availability of apps are found to be the least important. Findings due to gender, income and age difference were also analyzed and discussed for orderly decision-making purposes. Practical implications The ranking of factors showing what choice cues consumers consider most or least important in a particular market helps practitioners to develop appropriate adaptation strategies for the market. The comparison of findings for gender, income and age difference can further help practitioners to devise various alternative marketing strategies for different market segments and identify underserved segments, if any. Originality/value The BW scaling method, however, appropriate in ranking order of importance, had never been used in ranking choice cues of smartphone purchase. Moreover, there seems to be a dearth of studies about ranking of choice cues on smartphone purchases in the Chinese context.

Do service firm employee and customer relations matter for customer forgiveness in service recovery?

“…Firms realize these aspects once the damage is done. Unfortunately, these are the negative word of mouth that can push the existing and potential customers to competitors (Hennig-Thurau et al , 2010; Pinto et al , 2019). Therefore, this study offers a good news to service managers that customer forgiveness has a strong positive impact on repatronage intentions and has a negative impact on negative word of mouth intentions.…”

Comparison-based perceived attribute performance as a better antecedent of satisfaction, value and loyalty

“…Comparative approaches have been found to be useful in certain aspects of research on consumer perception. For example, when analysing the importance of attributes, attitudinal scales have been found to be difficult to assess by consumers, whereas comparative approaches such as the best-worst method (respondents are asked to choose the most important and the least important element from a set of attributes) allow respondents to evaluate attribute importance more easily and more accurately (Pinto et al, 2019).…”

Critical success factors for sustainable entrepreneurship in Pakistani Telecommunications industry: a hybrid grey systems theory/ best-worst method approach

“…The seminal conceptualization of the BWM was comprehensively explored by (Rezaei et al , 2016, 2017). Broadly speaking, BWM executes assessments of all criteria with respect to the most critical criterion, as predefined by decision-makers or experts (Pinto et al , 2019). Therefore, BWM overcomes the pairwise assessment limitations as regards perceived criterion performances, thus mitigating eventual discrepancies that may arise at the decision-making matrix level (Rezaei et al , 2018; van de Kaa et al , 2019).…”