2016
DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2016.11868925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking the Greatest Nba Players: A Sport Metrics Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of the 28 pairwise of the 8 characteristic objects were executed. Consequently, the Matrix of Expert Judgment (MEJ) was defined as (18), where each α ij value was calculated using Equation (11).…”
Section: Final Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison of the 28 pairwise of the 8 characteristic objects were executed. Consequently, the Matrix of Expert Judgment (MEJ) was defined as (18), where each α ij value was calculated using Equation (11).…”
Section: Final Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate player ranking is a crucial issue in both classic [18] and e-sport [19,20]. The result of a classification, calculated based on wins and losses in a competitive game, is often considered to be an indicator of a player's skills [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ranking models have been applied in the ranking of NBA basketball players [28], college sport coaches [19], alternatives in sports tournaments, products, political candidates [6], and others such as the PageRank algorithm introduced by Google [21]. The main aim of this study is to evaluate existing ranking models that may be used for student feedback and to develop an improved ranking feedback model by implementing mathematical programming techniques in three interrelated algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the selection of the adequate or more representative indices is highly interesting in sport science, as stated in [19], computing an global efficiency index is difficult due to the variety of individual statistics. In [26], the authors recommen to limit the use of individual statistics for predicting the final ranking of their teams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%