2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2011.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking uncertain sky: The probabilistic top-k skyline operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They used multivariate probability density function in terms of parametric equation. Zhang et al [11] proposed a top-k skyline computational model that addresses the problem of uncertain data, and implemented two efficient methods for data filtering and randomization process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used multivariate probability density function in terms of parametric equation. Zhang et al [11] proposed a top-k skyline computational model that addresses the problem of uncertain data, and implemented two efficient methods for data filtering and randomization process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Zhang et al [45] study the probabilistic top-k skyline operator, which retrieves the k uncertain objects with the highest skyline probabilities. It is worth noting that, unlike the aforementioned work, our MDSO operator still adopts the conventional dominance relationship (Definition 1), while it takes the potential weight of non-skyline objects into consideration, which is neglected by the above work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While [16] solves the case of probabilistic skyline computation with a pre-given threshold, [1] studies the problem of computing skyline probabilities for every object in the uncertain database. In [21], instead of a pre given probability threshold, k uncertain objects from the data set with the highest skyline probabilities are retrieved. Stochastic skyline operators are proposed in [13,19] to retain a minimum set of candidates for all ranking functions in the light of expected utility principles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%