2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2017.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranks of overpartitions modulo 6 and 10

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 7. The identities from (1.8) and (1.9) were proved by Ji, Zhang and Zhao [16], who further proved that N (0, 6, 3n) > N (2, 6, 3n) for n ≥ 1, and N (0, 6, 3n + 1) > N (2, 6, 3n + 1) for n ≥ 0. While (1.14) follows easily now for n ≡ 0, 1 (mod 3), the inequality is not at all clear for n ≡ 2 (mod 3), as the same authors also showed that N (0, 6, 3n + 2) < N (2, 6, 3n + 2) for n ≥ 1 and N (1, 6, 3n + 2) > N (3, 6, 3n + 2) for n ≥ 0.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Remark 7. The identities from (1.8) and (1.9) were proved by Ji, Zhang and Zhao [16], who further proved that N (0, 6, 3n) > N (2, 6, 3n) for n ≥ 1, and N (0, 6, 3n + 1) > N (2, 6, 3n + 1) for n ≥ 0. While (1.14) follows easily now for n ≡ 0, 1 (mod 3), the inequality is not at all clear for n ≡ 2 (mod 3), as the same authors also showed that N (0, 6, 3n + 2) < N (2, 6, 3n + 2) for n ≥ 1 and N (1, 6, 3n + 2) > N (3, 6, 3n + 2) for n ≥ 0.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Remark 6. Ji, Zhang and Zhao [16] proved (1.13) for n ≡ 0 (mod 5), whereas the inequality (1.14) is new.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations