“…On the other hand, the k − ε model's response to ∆ B is larger than that for SST k −ω, and again appears to be linear with ∆ B ; however, it is clear that the k − ε model overall gives much larger predicted value of C f than the experimental data; consequently, no experimental data are encompassed by the uncertainty bound generated from the k − ε model. It should be noted that thus far most UQ studies have focused on turbulent flow simulations, from which the 1c and 2c perturbations always increase the value of C f , while the opposite is true for the 3c perturbation, e.g., see 12,47,53 , which is consistent with the behavior observed with the SST k −ω and k −ε turbulence models, as well as the behavior observed in the fully turbulent region with the SST k − ω LM transition model. Figure 9 shows decaying of Tu in freestream as a function of Re x .…”