1996
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199610000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RANTES, MIP and interleukin-16 in HIV infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3), and the level of production was not dependent on an individual's absolute count or percentage of peripheral blood CD4ϩ cells, we conclude that there is no correlation between clinical state and chemokine production by PBMC, CD4ϩ, or CD8ϩ T cells. Other investigators in more limited studies have reached a similar conclusion in studies of CD8ϩ cells (44,46) as well as all three of these cell populations (47). The elevated ␤-chemokine production in AIDS patients would suggest that these chemokines are not protecting against disease progression either by their ability to competitively inhibit HIV interaction with its coreceptor on CD4ϩ cells, or by a protective mechanism based on their chemotactic activities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…3), and the level of production was not dependent on an individual's absolute count or percentage of peripheral blood CD4ϩ cells, we conclude that there is no correlation between clinical state and chemokine production by PBMC, CD4ϩ, or CD8ϩ T cells. Other investigators in more limited studies have reached a similar conclusion in studies of CD8ϩ cells (44,46) as well as all three of these cell populations (47). The elevated ␤-chemokine production in AIDS patients would suggest that these chemokines are not protecting against disease progression either by their ability to competitively inhibit HIV interaction with its coreceptor on CD4ϩ cells, or by a protective mechanism based on their chemotactic activities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Moreover, recent results indicate that human alloimmunization elicits very significant increases in the three ␤ chemokines RANTES, MIP-1␣, and MIP-1␤, and resistance of CD4 ϩ T cells to HIV infection with macrophagetropic HIV-1 strains (38). However, when the production of ␤ chemokines by unfractionated PBMCs, purified CD4 ϩ , or CD8 ϩ T cells was examined in small numbers of HIV-1 positive subjects, the analysis failed to demonstrate any association between chemokine levels and disease stage (39,40). Furthermore, plasma levels of ␤ chemokines did not reveal any substantial differences between progressors and nonprogressors (41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the bchemokines can effectively block HIV replication in vitro and CCR5 seems to have a clear role in HIV pathogenesis, there has been no consistent difference observed between chemokine levels from nonprogressing HIV-infected persons, progressing HIV-infected persons, and HIV-uninfecte d persons. [2][3][4][5][6] This has created controversy about the in vivo role of these chem okines in the pathogenesis of HIV disease. One explanation for these differing results may be due to the measurement of chem okines under different experim ental conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%