27Neurons must establish and stabilize connections made with diverse targets, each with distinct 28 demands and functional characteristics. At Drosophila neuromuscular junctions, synaptic 29 strength remains stable in a manipulation that simultaneously induces hypo-innervation on one 30 target and hyper-innervation on the other. However, the expression mechanisms that achieve 31 this exquisite target-specific homeostatic control remain enigmatic. Here, we identify the distinct 32 target-specific homeostatic expression mechanisms. On the hypo-innervated target, an increase 33 in postsynaptic glutamate receptor (GluR) abundance is sufficient to compensate for reduced 34 innervation, without any apparent presynaptic adaptations. In contrast, a target-specific 35 reduction in presynaptic neurotransmitter release probability is reflected by a decrease in active 36 zone components restricted to terminals of hyper-innervated targets. Finally, loss of 37 postsynaptic GluRs on one target induces a compartmentalized, homeostatic enhancement of 38 presynaptic neurotransmitter release called presynaptic homeostatic potentiation that can be 39 precisely balanced with the adaptations required for both hypo-and hyper-innervation to 40 maintain stable synaptic strength. Thus, distinct anterograde and retrograde signaling systems 41 operate at pre-and post-synaptic compartments to enable target-specific, homeostatic control of 42 neurotransmission. 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 3 INTRODUCTION
53Synapses are spectacularly diverse in their morphology, physiology, and functional 54 characteristics. These differences are reflected in the molecular composition and abundance of 55 synaptic components at heterogenous synaptic subtypes in central and peripheral nervous 56 systems (Atwood and Karunanithi, 2002; Branco and Staras, 2009; O'Rourke et al., 2012).
57Interestingly, the structure and function of synapses can also vary substantially across terminals 58 of an individual neuron (Fekete et al., 2019; Grillo et al., 2018; Guerrero et al., 2005) and drive 59 input-specific presynaptic plasticity (Letellier et al., 2019). Both Hebbian and homeostatic 60 plasticity mechanisms can work locally and globally at specific synapses to tune synapse 61 function, enabling stable yet flexible ranges of synaptic strength (Diering and Huganir, 2018; 62 Turrigiano, 2012; Vitureira and Goda, 2013). For example, homeostatic receptor scaling globally 63 adjusts GluR abundance, subtype, and/or functionality at dendrites (Turrigiano and Nelson,
642004) yet there is also evidence for synapse specificity (Béïque et al., 2011; Hou et al., 2008; 65 Sutton et al., 2006). Although a number of studies have begun to elucidate the factors that 66 enable both local and global modes of synaptic plasticity at synaptic compartments, it is less 67 appreciated how and why specific synapses undergo plasticity within the context and needs of 68 information transfer in a neural circuit.
69One major force that sculpts the heterogeneity of synaptic strength is impose...