2017
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid analysis of forensic‐related samples using two ambient ionization techniques coupled to high‐resolution mass spectrometers

Abstract: Interfacing LDTD and ASAP to high-resolution mass spectrometers allows for expeditious analysis of a wide range of samples, with minimal or no sample preparation. Both allow for rapid full scan, MS/MS, and/or MS experiments from a single sample introduction. Published in 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using an extraction time of 5 min, a desorption time of 12 s, and a spray time of 1.8 s with the dwell time set at 5 ms, we were able to achieve figures of merit for the suite of model compounds that were comparable to those obtained in short-spray experiments (Table ). Moreover, we were able to achieve a total sample analysis time of less than 10 s (3.2 s [sample preparation time] + 1.8 s [instrument time]); as such, the automated CBS’ analysis speed for detecting drugs of abuse in urine is comparable to online-SPE-MS and LDTD methods, both of which are recognized for their speed. , However, the signal generated via CBS is not Gaussian; it is an adjustable continuous square wave. Thus, the number of compounds that can be monitored is not limited by mass spectrometer performance (i.e., scan rate) but by signal generation time.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an extraction time of 5 min, a desorption time of 12 s, and a spray time of 1.8 s with the dwell time set at 5 ms, we were able to achieve figures of merit for the suite of model compounds that were comparable to those obtained in short-spray experiments (Table ). Moreover, we were able to achieve a total sample analysis time of less than 10 s (3.2 s [sample preparation time] + 1.8 s [instrument time]); as such, the automated CBS’ analysis speed for detecting drugs of abuse in urine is comparable to online-SPE-MS and LDTD methods, both of which are recognized for their speed. , However, the signal generated via CBS is not Gaussian; it is an adjustable continuous square wave. Thus, the number of compounds that can be monitored is not limited by mass spectrometer performance (i.e., scan rate) but by signal generation time.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. 47 The presence of the targeted compounds was established using the accurate masses of the protonated molecule [M + H] + and one of its major isotopes, both with mass tolerance of 5 mmu. For confirmation of identity, a targeted MS 2 experiment was performed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details in ref. [11] techniques coupled to HRMS [45], namely by laser diode thermal desorption or atmospheric solids analysis probe allowing fast analysis of a wide range of samples with minimal or no sample preparation. This ambient coupling confirmed again the universality of HRMS.…”
Section: Screening For Detection Of Drugs Poisons And/or Their Metamentioning
confidence: 99%