2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9an02069a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and accurate identification of marine microbes with single-cell Raman spectroscopy

Abstract: Rapid and accurate identification of individual microorganisms using single-cell Raman spectra combining with one-dimensional convolutional neural networks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for phototrophs such as microalgae, potential remains elusive . Specifically, for photosynthetic cells, two types of SCRS including “pigment spectrum” (PS; acquired before quenching) and “whole spectrum” (WS; collected after quenching) are possible, yet past studies have generally sampled either PS or WS, but not both; thus, the optimal strategy to extract information from SCRS remains to be developed. , Moreover, the breadth of sampling over the microalgal space has been extremely limited, as only a few species were included in tests for phylogenetic classification , or metabolite profiling. Furthermore, SCRS are sensitive to not only “phylogeny” but also the “state” of a cell, yet existing experimental designs have generally failed to distinguish them. Consequentially, how broadly applicable or reliable the approach is for microalgae remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for phototrophs such as microalgae, potential remains elusive . Specifically, for photosynthetic cells, two types of SCRS including “pigment spectrum” (PS; acquired before quenching) and “whole spectrum” (WS; collected after quenching) are possible, yet past studies have generally sampled either PS or WS, but not both; thus, the optimal strategy to extract information from SCRS remains to be developed. , Moreover, the breadth of sampling over the microalgal space has been extremely limited, as only a few species were included in tests for phylogenetic classification , or metabolite profiling. Furthermore, SCRS are sensitive to not only “phylogeny” but also the “state” of a cell, yet existing experimental designs have generally failed to distinguish them. Consequentially, how broadly applicable or reliable the approach is for microalgae remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Raman spectroscopy was indicated to identify and quantify the molecular modifications of collagen and seems to be an interesting tool to study biological processes [162]. A novel detecting method, single-cell Raman spectroscopy (scRS) coupled with one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1DCNN) was explored to identify individual marine microorganisms quickly and accurately [163]. Moreover, combined microscopy-infrared (AFM-IR) spectroscopy and tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) provided a novel and automated approach to identify the structure of viruses [164].…”
Section: Developing Technologies For Structure Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raman spectroscopy is a label-free, rapid, and highly sensitive analytical technology [4][5][6][7], and in recent years, it has been used to identify bacteria [6,[8][9][10]. In various Raman technologies, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is a commonly used tool for bacterial analysis, which has been widely used in bacterial cell cycle monitoring [11], drug resistance [12], and identification [4,8,[13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with traditional algorithms, such as support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and k‐nearest‐neighbor (KNN) algorithms, the classification accuracy of DL algorithms has been dramatically improved. Liu et al explored the rapid identification of 10 marine microorganisms and three nonmarine actinomycetes via single‐cell Raman spectroscopy, with an average accuracy of 88.5% ± 4% using one‐dimensional convolutional neural networks (1DCNN) [9]. Lu et al achieved an average accuracy of 95.64% ± 5.46% at a single‐cell level using CNNs (ConvNet) to classify 14 microbial species [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%