2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and low-cost identification of common sole (Solea solea) in the field using a fast DNA isolation protocol and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…45 For the P. platessa primer set, only a LB primer could be designed, which could explain the slightly lower LOD of the P. platessa assay. Compared to the recently published results of Deconinck et al, 31 the LOD of the S. solea assay of this study is lower than 0.1 ng because instead of a colorimetric readout, a more sensitive method has been used. To sum up, the P. platessa specific LAMP assay detected up to 0.1 ng of target DNA, and the S. solea specific LAMP assay detected 0.01 ng.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…45 For the P. platessa primer set, only a LB primer could be designed, which could explain the slightly lower LOD of the P. platessa assay. Compared to the recently published results of Deconinck et al, 31 the LOD of the S. solea assay of this study is lower than 0.1 ng because instead of a colorimetric readout, a more sensitive method has been used. To sum up, the P. platessa specific LAMP assay detected up to 0.1 ng of target DNA, and the S. solea specific LAMP assay detected 0.01 ng.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…platessa assay. Compared to the recently published results of Deconinck et al, the LOD of the S. solea assay of this study is lower than 0.1 ng because instead of a colorimetric readout, a more sensitive method has been used.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the PCR method has been used for fish identification for a long time, the LAMP method is still used more for the detection of fish parasites and other microorganisms. 49−52 To the best of our knowledge, the use of LAMP for the identification of the fish itself has been published only for the members of salmon, 53,54 trout, 55 tuna, 29,56 eel, 57 cod, 58 common sole, 59 Arothorn or Diodon genus. 60,61 Thus, we believe that the present paper is the first to propose a LAMP protocol for pike species identification and, moreover, one of the few that use a nuclear gene as a marker since most published protocols have focused on mitochondrial cytochrome b.…”
Section: Gcagaa[+c]tttaa) and Shorter Probe Esox_p3 With Even Modific...mentioning
confidence: 99%